Discussion Let's be real now... Are all these other medications really necessary?

[cringelord111]

This question has been asked a lot but im asking it again.

People have obviously CTBd without meto, or antacids or whatever.

Are they really THAT necessary?

 

[WorthlessTrash]

It minimizes the risk of you botching it.

 

[shrek34]

They aren't necessary but unless you can't get them there isn't a reason not to use them. Many people succeed with CTB even after vomiting. I think that's why the recommended dose has gone up to 25g even though the lethal amount is only around 2g. It's so that enough SN is absorbed in a short amount of time so that even if you vomit, your chances are still high.

 

[watchingthewheels]

This question has been asked a lot but im asking it again.

People have obviously CTBd without meto, or antacids or whatever.

Are they really THAT necessary?

You know the question has been asked, so you must know the answer, yet, are asking again...Are you expecting a different answer this time?
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results..."

 

[Doombox]

You know the question has been asked, so you must know the answer, yet, are asking again...Are you expecting a different answer this time?
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results..."

I think the big meto conundrum just makes some of us crazy.

 

[WorthlessTrash]

You know the question has been asked, so you must know the answer, yet, are asking again...Are you expecting a different answer this time?
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results..."

He might be hoping to be assured that you can CTB using SN without it.

 

[watchingthewheels]

He might be hoping to be assured that you can CTB using SN without it.

That's a given. But how? By asking a question to which was admitted has been asked, and answered, several times?
How many times is enough? And the answer will be different this time, because...?

Is the question being asked again because the previous info was incomplete, or because the conclusion was rejected?
Is this a question in search of an answer, or just asking until he gets the answer that he wants to hear, in a vain attempt to bargain with reality?

 

[WorthlessTrash]

That's a given. But how? By asking a question to which was admitted has been asked, and answered, several times?
How many times is enough? And the answer will be different this time, because...?

Is the question being asked again because the previous info was incomplete, or because the conclusion was rejected?
Is this a question in search of an answer, or a vain attempt to bargain with reality?

I agree with you it's repetitive. He probably should have just bumped an old thread, tbh.