N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 5,756
I think this is a tough question and chatGPT could probably give a better answer than me.
It might depend on the perspective. A socialist or right-wing extreme person will say that conventional wisdom is most often wrong and very distorted.
There will be many enlightend centrists who determine mainstream points and sort of create conventional wisdom.
It might depend on the conventional wisdom we speak about. Media narratives. Or conventional wisdom within particular science communities.
It seems like following the herd is part of our nature. But there were so many examplse where conventional wisdom, knowledge or facts turned out to be completely false. There is always an uncertainty in our considerations and we humans (me included) often underestimate that. Especially if the facts we believe in define our identity and make us part of a community.
I think in order to be an independent thinker one has to leave the general consensus and leave the comfort zone of going with the herd all the time. But there is the risk one ends up as a fool when afterwards everyone makes jokes about you for a bold statement or prediction. I was wrong on my take that Kamala's win is pretty certain. I did not consider it a coin flip election. But with my predictions about Trump's presidency I was thus far right. However, fans of him would vehemently disagree with me on that.
What do you think?
It might depend on the perspective. A socialist or right-wing extreme person will say that conventional wisdom is most often wrong and very distorted.
There will be many enlightend centrists who determine mainstream points and sort of create conventional wisdom.
It might depend on the conventional wisdom we speak about. Media narratives. Or conventional wisdom within particular science communities.
It seems like following the herd is part of our nature. But there were so many examplse where conventional wisdom, knowledge or facts turned out to be completely false. There is always an uncertainty in our considerations and we humans (me included) often underestimate that. Especially if the facts we believe in define our identity and make us part of a community.
I think in order to be an independent thinker one has to leave the general consensus and leave the comfort zone of going with the herd all the time. But there is the risk one ends up as a fool when afterwards everyone makes jokes about you for a bold statement or prediction. I was wrong on my take that Kamala's win is pretty certain. I did not consider it a coin flip election. But with my predictions about Trump's presidency I was thus far right. However, fans of him would vehemently disagree with me on that.
What do you think?