• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
N

noname223

Archangel
Aug 18, 2020
6,628
The main message must be. The way the media talks about the issues is not real. The way the mainstream looks at politics is distorted. Don't be a sheep listen to me and I will give you the full picture.
Mainstream narratives have to be questioned. There are many media narratives. And your task is to dissect them and to correct them. The way politics is discussed is biased and distorted. But your brand has to explain what exactly is wrong about it. You need a framing, a world view and an identity. You have to create an own narrative. Who are the good ones? Who are the bad actors?
I think there is some truth in it. The mainstream coverage is in many cases distorted. But the ways the news are manipulated are often not that attractive to talk about. The way the news are often censored is more often implicit and not explicit. At least in the Western world. It is ingrained in the media system and the way it interacts with institutions, politicians and journalists. The latter ones need access and are willing to do favors for getting this exact access.

My personal view is follow the money. And politics is often manufactured by billionaires. Politics by the wealthy for the wealthy. I like Slavoj Zizek or Douglas Rushkoff. Smart marxist analysts. The problem with them. Often they cannot offer an enticing countervision. The right is good at creating a dytopia. But the leftwingers cannot agree on basic things and often remain seperated groups at odds with each other. Leftwing utopias sound naive and often don't seem to get the human narure right. This is at least my impression.
 
  • Like
Reactions: katagiri83