Discussion I think afterlife is much more probable, than many people see it

[Sadbanana]

Here is my reasoning. If we are concious now and conciousness is a dependent process then one could assume that after death it will form again eventually. Why is it something that could never repeat? Once an event happen you can assume or even count on that it will eventually happen again.

If there is no conciousness after death, then there is no time of nothingness, as you can't experience nothing. Just as after anesthesia you it feels like you just skipped time, after death you probably will immediately get into another experience. Even if in reality unimaginable amount of time might have passed.

 

[Hvergelmir]

If we are concious now and conciousness is a dependent process then one could assume that after death it will form again eventually.

Assuming infinite time and that the universe never reaches an equilibrium, this holds true - but so is anything else that could ever be.

That's a pretty big assumption, though.

 

[Sadbanana]

Assuming infinite time and that the universe never reaches an equilibrium, this holds true - but so is anything else that could ever be.

That's a pretty big assumption, though.

Yes it is. But I would say, absolute entropy is also an assumption. From my point of view it is 50/50, or maybe more accurately an absolute unknown whether or not there is an afterlife. But I don't think believing there is none is any more rational than believing there is.