Everything you said makes sense and is understandable until you ask yourself a couple questions. Would I say the same if this was a PoC who was complaining because white people ( who had indeed been victimized by people of color) were saying they hate them? Or an trans person? A man can't help being a man any more than a Hispanic, African, Asian, lesbian or transitioning person can help being what they are. Imagine the hellstorm here if someone said "I hate all _____ (insert person of color) they're all evil..." even if they'd been victimized by someone of the same ethnicity.
I don't believe it's ever ok to say things like 'l hate all men they're all horrible and evil' (which I've seen expressed multiple times if not the exact words) no matter what trauma may be in a person's past. Abuse trauma etc.... is never an excuse to cause trauma or be an abuser.
True- that's a fair observation to make. I also tend to think the same coment about women said outright here: 'I hate women' might possibly have been blocked. Although, I'm not sure. It's expressing a personal opinion. Not inciting violence or hatred from others. (Although, that tends to happen organically.) There is certainly misogyny here though. There are plenty of complaints about that too.
Consider this though instead: 'I find I have a profound mistrust and dislike towards [insert demographic- men, women, gay, trans, black, white- whatever] because of multiple past trauma with people of that gender/ sexuality/ race.' Phrased like that, I think it would be more acceptable. That's not justifying our hatred. That's saying that likely awful experiences in our lives have given us a negative bias.
I suppose I was defending a person's right to vent and express their experience- I also defended incels within that context. I made it clear that outright hate speech wasn't acceptible though. Plus, that we need to be considering how we phrase things so that we don't hurt others.
Also, at the time of posting, I wasn't clear on which post the OP felt hurt by. I hadn't realised at that time, it was such an outright 'hatred towards men' post.
They had commented on a different thread questioning the link between femcels and ideation, which I felt had presented a more balanced argument.
The member in that thread refered to the high degree of violence towards women and, systemic problems in society that historically meant, these attrocities were sometimes ignored and enabled and probably still are to some extent today.
That's also not to say men don't suffer too. The way we perceive things as a society mean that plenty of people don't get the protection or support they need. A different example is the less recognition and support men suffering with anorexia used to get. Because it always used to be seen as a solely female affliction.
The person did on the one hand use the word 'most men' regarding their analysis but then, they were clear to specify it wasn't all men. But, the OP took deep offence at that too.
I do completely understand that we all get triggered by certain topics. I suppose we have to find a way through though, so that we all get a voice. Again- certainly, if it's outright hate speech, it's fair to call someone out or, even report them if it's that bad.
However, if they're staying within the guidelines and at least trying to create a reasonable argument: 'Women are afraid of male violence', could be viewed as a reasonable argument- I think we need to think more carefully how we respond.
It's not to blame the OP but, comments against men obviously trigger him to feel worse. If someone makes a more genuinely presented argument on why women may hold fear and resentment towards men- especially when they cite sexual assualt and abuse, that's also maybe not the time to reply that such comments are hurtful and are a tantamount wish/ make him conclude that all men should die. No one said that or suggested that in the slightest!
Of course, the OP also deserves the right to vent and express grievances. I'd say, creating a thread like this one is the way to do it though. Plus- to even express that it doesn't have to be outright hate posts that trigger them. It can be any posts that criticise male behaviour because it troubles them that so many women are afraid, distrustful and possibly, even hate men.
It doesn't exactly work so well calling out genuine grievances against male violence directly though. By saying that such speech makes them want to die. That can be seen as trying to silence a genuine grievance via mannipulation. As in- don't complain about male violence because, it makes me want to die more.
Once again- a separate thread like this one is the place to do that: 'Negative comments towards men make me suicidal'. That allows the woman space to still vent about their genuine grievances, while it also gives the man space to say that negative responses to men- even when justified, intensify their ideation.
I effectively think we all have a responsibility. We should try to phrase sentiments that are likely to be offensive in a manner that demonstrates it is our own bias- likely because of trauma. But also, we should respect another person's right to express genuine grievancies about the world- rape, abuse and society enabling rape and abuse is a genuine grievance!