B

Battered_Seoul

Experienced
Jun 13, 2018
248
Apologies if this has already been addressed, but is there any specific technical reason why the exit bag scenario is a bag enclosing the face and not a larger bag enclosing and cocooning the body?

Could Nitrogen be fed into say, a 200 L body bag, using the same underlying principles?
 
ladylazarus4

ladylazarus4

exhausted
May 12, 2024
204
The bag around the face requires less nitrogen and is less expensive. Also, the key is that you want the bag to fill up with nitrogen before pulling it down around your face, so that when you breath in, you pass out quickly. You wouldn't be able to do that with a body bag, because getting in would let a lot of the nitrogen escape.
 
B

Battered_Seoul

Experienced
Jun 13, 2018
248
The bag around the face requires less nitrogen and is less expensive. Also, the key is that you want the bag to fill up with nitrogen before pulling it down around your face, so that when you breath in, you pass out quickly. You wouldn't be able to do that with a body bag, because getting in would let a lot of the nitrogen escape.
Thank you.

Hypothetically, would it be possible for a person to turn on the gas at a reasonable flow rate, feed the tube into the bag, then enter and seal the bag at the beginning of the process, waiting for the Nitrogen to build up?

I wondered if the larger space would negate the carbon dioxide build up issues.
 

Similar threads

Z
Replies
4
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
finalincarnate
F
sevennn
Replies
0
Views
352
Suicide Discussion
sevennn
sevennn
L
Replies
20
Views
918
Suicide Discussion
livingdeath
L
M
Replies
3
Views
188
Suicide Discussion
MyTimeIsUp
M