L'absent
À ma manière 🪦
- Aug 18, 2024
- 1,150
Sodium nitrite is so popular primarily because of its extreme availability and accessibility, factors that make it a common choice for many people. However, its use comes with numerous issues: not only are the side effects often unpredictable, but the process itself can be long, painful, and uncertain. Vomiting, tachycardia, a sense of suffocation, and other symptoms can occur without any guarantee of a final outcome, leaving room for doubt and prolonged physical suffering.I second this
SN is hyped so much for no good reason. People claim peacefulness, when every single attemt involves puking. And then there is a days long protocoll with specific timestamps and additional medication required.
I feel like SN is a method that people want to make work and has no inherent potential of peacefulness by itself.
SN might still be relativeley peaceful option, but it cant compeat with something like inert gas.
This goes for accessability and easy of use.
In contrast, hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) at extremely high concentrations, above 800-1000 ppm, stands out for its speed and effectiveness. At these levels, it causes unconsciousness within seconds, followed by death within minutes, without the person being aware of what is happening. This makes it, from a technical perspective, a much more direct and "certain" method. There are none of the uncertainties, discomforts, or physical suffering associated with sodium nitrite. With hydrogen sulfide, the outcome is practically guaranteed, leaving no room for painful experiences or unforeseen complications, making it, in a direct comparison, a significantly more "effective" choice than sodium nitrite.