An update on the OFCOM situation: As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. OFCOM, the UK’s communications regulator, has singled out our community, demanding compliance with their Online Safety Act despite our minimal UK presence. This is a blatant overreach, and they have been sending letters pressuring us to comply with their censorship agenda.
Our platform is already blocked by many UK ISPs, yet they continue their attempts to stifle free speech. Standing up to this kind of regulatory overreach requires lots of resources to maintain our infrastructure and fight back against these unjust demands. If you value our community and want to support us during this time, we would greatly appreciate any and all donations.
At the risk of sounding insensitive, I just can't understand how anyone doesn't get that consciousness comes from the body. Think about it. Consciousness doesn't just fly around the room. It's very localized. Do you really think it's a coincidence that the place where you feel it is exactly in your head? You know, where the brain is. View attachment 68141
I'd recommend looking into Sam Harris and other scientists and what they have to say about the strange lack of any objective proof that consciousness ought to exist at all. I mean, why does it? It's weird, I wonder if computer ai has some semblance of consciousness
I'd recommend looking into Sam Harris and other scientists and what they have to say about the strange lack of any objective proof that consciousness ought to exist at all. I mean, why does it? It's weird, I wonder if computer ai has some semblance of consciousness
I'm no scientist, but isn't the fact that it does exist proof enough? Us failing to grasp the connection between mind and matter is no proof that there's no connection. You ask "why does it?", but really, why not?
Technically we can't know either way. However it's a giant leap from consciousness stored in a finite material brain to consciousness that could exist separate from said brain let alone somehow move from body to body. That seems like an awful lot of wishful thinking by people who can't accept their own mortality so they make up stories that give them a sort of emotional relief.
Clearly our consciousness as human-beings is intimately tied to our brain: if parts of it are destroyed or damaged our consciousness is diminished or altered. Since this can hardly be disputed how did it get there assuming reincarnation is real? Why would it take maturation of the brain to fully express this consciousness to the point of abstract reasoning, complex emotions and the deep seated belief in individuality or even reincarnation?
You'd think that if reincarnation is real consciousness must be immaterial: how can the non-material (consciousness) interact with the material (the body)? The French philosopher Descartes assumed duality according to his christian beliefs: humans are made up of a body and a soul. Yet he completely failed to explain how this interaction was even possible and his hypothesis (soul and body meet in the pineal gland in the brain) is pretty much ludicrous. He probably only came up with it because there was no explanation for why it was even there in the first place.
Believing in something doesn't make it true. Since there is no evidence reincarnation is even remotely possible I simply assume death is the final and permanent end to individuals. Occam's razor (entities should not be multiplied without necessity meaning the simplest explanation is theoretically preferable) would suggest a negative answer to the question.
In any case we don't know how consciousness arose but that does not make reincarnation any more likely since reincarnation can't be explained either. How can we possibly know we were ever alive before being born?
This isn't related to your question but I don't get the appeal of reincarnation: who would want to be reborn in any case? Isn't one life enough to convince anyone of its perfect meaninglessness and uselessness? Even the religions that are built upon the assumption of reincarnation claim it's better to escape life altogether although their explanations about how this could possibly be achieved don't exactly make sense.
I'm no scientist, but isn't the fact that it does exist proof enough? Us failing to grasp the connection between mind and matter is no proof that there's no connection. You ask "why does it?", but really, why not?
Yes, I wasn't tying to say that it doesn't exist just that it's interesting that it's such a difficult phenomena for science to observe or make objective.
And I guess it's a matter of personal preference of what questions to ask.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.