I'm not sure. I don't think about the concepts as rigidly as I used to. I think about actions more in the context that they're done for reasons unique to each individual, for reasons that may not make sense unless you are that individual. Even a serial killer is only obeying his nature. If he's to be punished, the punishment should aim to reform him and keep others safe from him, not to inflict some 'deserved' suffering. This doesn't stop me from feeling guilty about my actions though, of course, as even this view doesn't just remove my desire to do what I think is right, it just acknowledges that I'm fundamentally no different from anyone else.
I feel as if I can be too irritable sometimes, which I immediately regret. I also think I neglect my friendships too much, sometimes deliberately not replying to a message because I'm too tired. Also, you could say I'm bad for not actively doing anything about a lot of larger-scale issues or volunteering and things like that; I don't agree with the idea that complicity makes you just as bad, but then again I'm uncertain on the whole concept of 'bad'. Ultimately you can say that my irritability and avoidant nature are only because of mental problems, and it would be correct, but it doesn't mean I want myself to be this way or that it's a good thing. The consequences are still real. It's just that things aren't so clear-cut. Even if I didn't feel bad about all this, would it really make me evil just because my brain rewards me for doing bad things? It's a tricky topic, but I don't think it encourages people to be more bad; like I said, I still dislike doing bad things, I'm just conscious of why I do what I do.