I'm worried about the reliability of the charcoal method. Some people get lucky with a few gram, some fail with 8KG. I also imagine things getting really hot.
While with the generator, I can get a full face protector made for painters with the gas filter. Saves the eyes, plus helps with the smell and some other toxins.
Are you still for charcoal, and if yes, why?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here, but if you're wearing a "full face protector with a gas filter", won't that, also, impede you from breathing in the CO (gas)?
There are "scientific" methods for determining the correct amount of charcoal to use.
Yeah, I'm still using charcoal. I have full confidence in it. I will conduct several "trial" runs to make sure that I can consistently achieve a CO level high enough to ensure a quick death. Also, I have a CO analyzer that will let me know that the level I need of CO is present within the tightly sealed tent that I'll be using.
Many people die of CO poisoning in their sleep each year caused by faulty furnaces and plugged-up chimneys, and I can all but guarantee that the levels that kill them, are nowhere close to what can be achieved by burning charcoal, intentionally, in an enclosed space.
CO has been the "go-to" method of suicide for decades. It was the prevailing method when cars had no catalytic converters. Using charcoal is just another iteration of that method, and an improved one, I would argue. If someone does their homework on it, and takes the necessary steps to ensure success - correct charcoal, enough charcoal, burning charcoal correctly, right enclosure sealed properly - the CO method has an extremely high reliability of success. And what I like most about it is that it renders you unconscious
before actual death occurs, akin to dying in your sleep. Unless I get Nembutal, or its equivalent, that's the method I have the most confidence in.