TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,826
Growing up and through my experiences in life, activities I do, and many more, I oftenly come across such an annoying platitude, which is "Don't compare yourself to others!"
First off, I would assert that such a statement is not in line with reality and how the world works. Humans themselves are very comparative as well as competitive too, that is just reality and how the world works. In fact, in order to motivate someone to do something and become functional or successful in life (not in the sense of recovery, but just in about any facet of life, whether it is financial, social, educational, personal, or (you name it) area), one has to have a point of reference for a comparison to be made. Sure, metrics and how well (or poor) one does at a certain activity is relative to the comparison between the two (or multiple) targets. Without such metrics and reference points, one will be blind and unable to (realistically and accurately) gauge their performance. They (for all the time) could be blindly believing that they are success or good, but again success and good are relative terms that are subjective and only have meaning when they are put into context (actual comparisons).
For example, if someone wanted to become a professional baseball player and play well (on national teams and what not), obviously said person would have to compare themselves to other professional baseball players in order to see where the baseline is. What do I mean by baselines? A baseline is a standard, threshold, or minimum level of adequacy that one has to meet in order to succeed in whatever area, facet, or activity that one partakes in. Therefore (in this example) if someone wishes to become a professional baseball player, but fails to meet the baseline to just become one, then said person would not be able to become a professional baseball player.
Another example is when someone wishes to become good at a certain activity in a certain game. Let's say someone wishes to be good at raiding a boss in a video game, and their goal is to become the top 0.1% raiders in the video game itself. In order to do so, one would have to know what the 0.1% does to reach said levels of success, then follow their footsteps (strategies, training, practice, and more).
Just fyi, the examples that I give are not me, but just other people out in the world. But nonetheless, my point still stands, the platitude of "Don't compare yourself to others!" is oftenly misguided and disingenuous. Sure, if one's comparison is nonfunctional and not productive (in other words, dwelling on their shortcomings and not putting any "real" effort to improve or to try to remedy said situation.), then it could be detrimental to said person's mental health and sanity. However, to say that as a blanket statement is not helpful to the people who wish to improve and seek to achieve glory, greatness.
What are your thoughts and take on this? Have you ever experienced such statements epoused by common people in your day to day life?
First off, I would assert that such a statement is not in line with reality and how the world works. Humans themselves are very comparative as well as competitive too, that is just reality and how the world works. In fact, in order to motivate someone to do something and become functional or successful in life (not in the sense of recovery, but just in about any facet of life, whether it is financial, social, educational, personal, or (you name it) area), one has to have a point of reference for a comparison to be made. Sure, metrics and how well (or poor) one does at a certain activity is relative to the comparison between the two (or multiple) targets. Without such metrics and reference points, one will be blind and unable to (realistically and accurately) gauge their performance. They (for all the time) could be blindly believing that they are success or good, but again success and good are relative terms that are subjective and only have meaning when they are put into context (actual comparisons).
For example, if someone wanted to become a professional baseball player and play well (on national teams and what not), obviously said person would have to compare themselves to other professional baseball players in order to see where the baseline is. What do I mean by baselines? A baseline is a standard, threshold, or minimum level of adequacy that one has to meet in order to succeed in whatever area, facet, or activity that one partakes in. Therefore (in this example) if someone wishes to become a professional baseball player, but fails to meet the baseline to just become one, then said person would not be able to become a professional baseball player.
Another example is when someone wishes to become good at a certain activity in a certain game. Let's say someone wishes to be good at raiding a boss in a video game, and their goal is to become the top 0.1% raiders in the video game itself. In order to do so, one would have to know what the 0.1% does to reach said levels of success, then follow their footsteps (strategies, training, practice, and more).
Just fyi, the examples that I give are not me, but just other people out in the world. But nonetheless, my point still stands, the platitude of "Don't compare yourself to others!" is oftenly misguided and disingenuous. Sure, if one's comparison is nonfunctional and not productive (in other words, dwelling on their shortcomings and not putting any "real" effort to improve or to try to remedy said situation.), then it could be detrimental to said person's mental health and sanity. However, to say that as a blanket statement is not helpful to the people who wish to improve and seek to achieve glory, greatness.
What are your thoughts and take on this? Have you ever experienced such statements epoused by common people in your day to day life?