• New TOR Mirror: suicidffbey666ur5gspccbcw2zc7yoat34wbybqa3boei6bysflbvqd.onion

  • Hey Guest,

    If you want to donate, we have a thread with updated donation options here at this link: About Donations

Abyssal

Abyssal

Recovered and alive, less suicidal
Nov 26, 2023
1,041
Maybe you should go back and read the comments because I only responded when they talked to me lmao.

And I never even said I disagreed so I'd appreciate you not putting words in my mouth.
I dont know why you felt the need to try and play Superman when me and spades were talking back and forth. Disappointing to see from you because I usually love to see your comments.
Slept on this. I acted emotionally because the thread is triggering to me. Sorry about that. Last sentence help to ground me back to a better place so thanks for that. I should avoid these debate threads from now on.
 
breezeboy

breezeboy

To infinity and beyond
Dec 8, 2023
406
Slept on this. I acted emotionally because the thread is triggering to me. Sorry about that. Last sentence help to ground me back to a better place so thanks for that. I should avoid these debate threads from now on.
I understand and it's all good. I apologize as well.

And that's probably a good idea for me too. I regretted even saying anything in this thread
 
  • Hugs
  • Love
Reactions: tiger b and Abyssal
SexyIncél

SexyIncél

🍭my lollipop brings the feminists to my candyshop
Aug 16, 2022
1,400
What I was saying is that science does not support your speculation while adding some stuff for any reader who might be passing by.
Well, you said that "genetics is poorly correlated with human nature." But take bell hooks's claim: "Most women do not want to deal with male pain if it interferes with the satisfaction of female desire."

We don't need scientists to tell us that most conscious beings don't like you interfering with their desires. Clearly a biological component here, regardless of what scientists say. While all knowledge is fallible, this seems clear

Humans aren't amoeboid creatures, infinitely flexible, adapting to anything. (Even amoebas are constrained by genetics, so I say "amoeboid".) There's a reason we communicate like humans, not like dogs. `With any other animal, we see they're clearly constrained by their genetics. Why not humans?

Now, you could talk in Urdu & I could talk Spanish. Genetics allows a range of behaviors, within those constraints. But even a tiny change to English grammar can make it a non-language — children couldn't learn it so effortlessly using their built-in language faculties, it'll always feel counter-intuitive
 
Last edited:
casual_existence

casual_existence

Student
Jul 29, 2023
192
Well, you said that "genetics is poorly correlated with human nature." But take bell hooks's claim: "Most women do not want to deal with male pain if it interferes with the satisfaction of female desire."

We don't need scientists to tell us that most conscious beings don't like you interfering with their desires. Clearly a biological component here, regardless of what scientists say. While all knowledge is fallible, this seems clear

Humans aren't amoeboid creatures, infinitely flexible, adapting to anything. (Even amoebas are constrained by genetics, so I say "amoeboid".) There's a reason we communicate like humans, not like dogs. `With any other animal, we see they're clearly constrained by their genetics. Why not humans?

Now, you could talk in Urdu & I could talk Spanish. Genetics allows a range of behaviors, within those constraints. But even a tiny change to English grammar can make it a non-language — children couldn't learn it so effortlessly using their built-in language faculties, it'll always feel counter-intuitive
I don't believe we're in disagreement as much as you may think. But I do have to disagree with the biological component which I'm assuming is genetics. Genetics cannot encode culture or brain structure. Due to the nature of brain structures it's unclear where exactly the hypothalamus is or where liking someone based on some arbitrary norm is.

And considering how you mentioned language it's similar to smell in mammals. They learn this when they're young. But humans, because they have a brain, can learn things outside of their nurture and continue to do so for a very long time.

With that being said while we can make some claim about individuals as if there were some ground truth and then extrapolate from there it's more than likely that the conclusion one can get from that is going to be wrong.

We could even take the space that genetics could produce but I hope that it's clear that that space is not infinitely big but it's ridiculously huge and that's not even taking into account human brains which multiplies the size further. I just consider it inconvenient to operate with an assumption based on genetics when it hasn't matched my world experience and science is always changing and very limited in what it can do.

And evolutionarily speaking it wouldn't make sense to produce a creature that decides that using a condom is a good idea. Yet here we are actively going against what genetics should have us do.
 
RainAndSadness

RainAndSadness

Administrator
Jun 12, 2018
2,083
So much misogyny while this person literally says they would support male genocide and gets a hug reaction by a mod?

I would say I am shocked because I kinda liked this place but after witnessing this I am out of here for good. I may be emotional today compared to my usual self but I am still a human and this doesn't sit well with me.

Some people are so brainwashed by any group they fall into it is unreal and I observed this since I felt it on my own skin as a child. Being judged for what was out of my control and not treated as individual. But at least I didn't gew up to be another blinded by hatred and brainwashed by cults.



Seriously though. I don't understand the problem. This is a thread where someone points to supposed increase in mysoginy on this board, mentioning Andrew Tate talking points and you have members in this thread defending that guy teeth and nail and making an entire debate on how he isn't actually that much of a problem and your issue is me providing comfort to someone who is obviously upset (as anyone should be) after reading that discussion and me giving a supportive emote to this person and not the people defending an actual mysoginist who has a real-life impact on millions of men around the world?

I just want to inform everyone again that this guy claims women belong to men in relationships and how rape victims must bear responsibility for their attacks. Talking points by the way which equate rule violations in this forum, before anyone starts defending them here.

And: if you wonder why I give a reaction to a certain member, you can just ask me. There is no need to create unnecessary drama about it. I already had to defend myself for hours and hours when I gave FuneralCry a like a while ago and I find it very concerning how I can't even use this forum like a normal member anymore because oh no I'm a mod so me reacting to someone definitely must imply I support violence towards men? Okay.
 
Last edited:
D

DreamEnd

Enlightened
Aug 4, 2022
1,851
I'm posting this in the suicide discussion portion of this board rather than the off topic section because I see it the most here and I feel it's important to call attention to as I'm sure this also makes a lot of other members uncomfortable as well.

This is a suicide discussion board that has a large base of both women and queer people, and for years, it's given marginalized groups the platform to vent about suicidality and given compassion to those who would otherwise have received none, and lended ears to voices who would have remained unheard.

Which is why I think it's an important issue to address! I'm likely not well equipped to discuss this as I'm still learning about such topics, but man, someone's gotta say something, you know?

You just have to nip it in the bud sometimes..

This is an open discussion so if you have any counter points or anything you wish to add that I missed or skimmed over, please do so.

And if I got anything wrong, then please correct me and I will apologize.

I'm again, still very new to this all and my hands are shaking as I type this. I hate confrontation but this has really been bugging me lately and I can't not say something otherwise it'll just continue to happen.

Some parts of this post may be worded a bit harshly to prove a point, though these moments are few and far between, I tried my best not to be overly mean but please let me know if I've crossed a line.

If a moderator takes issue with this post, also please let me know so I can refrain from posting things like this in the future!


So, without further a do..

I started lurking this forum about 2 years ago and I officially joined in early July. Soon after that I took a bit of a break from this forum and I only recently became active again.

And over the course of the time I've been here, I've noticed an uptick in misogyny which has only been steadily increasing since late 2022.

I now see unsubstantiated and quite frankly, ludacris talking points pulled straight from right-wing podcasts such as Fresh and Fit and famous sex trafficker Andrew Tate-

By men telling women what they do and do not find attractive instead of simply listening because they think all women that live outside the box of stereotypical cisnormative femininity are either lying or just an exception to their arbitrary rules that they treat as gospel.

Whereas before, I'd only encountered misogyny once or thrice here.

I don't believe this to be an incel issue as they've always been a part of this forum to some capacity. The incels who used to be here weren't misogynists and were actually pretty reasonable and understanding.

They were simply lonely men who didn't know where to start or even how to talk to people generally. And that loneliness has become all too common unfortunately amongst all people regardless of gender due to cities not being walkable and public places to hang out becoming all the more scarce.

Which has resulted in the sudden rise of lonely men, women, and enbies. There are many articles about this topic that I'd love to discuss in detail but this is already going to be a long post as is,,

Anway, sorry about that tangent, as I was saying-

Now, I constantly see new threads popping up with men discussing how women are biologically wired for xyz and other odd talking points with absolutely no proof for their claims beyond Tinder studies that fail to take into account that:

1 . There are more men than women that use Tinder.

2 . This worldview that hinges on a select few traits being desirable falls apart the second you factor in LGBTQ+ folk. Bisexuals, lesbians, gays, asexuals, etc etc!

Hell, that's all without taking into account the many kink/fetish circles where people can be attracted to robots, objects, watching others or themselves gain weight, being tied up, feet, hands, etc!!

(BTW, I'm not equating LGBTQ+ people to people with kinks or fetishes!! They're obviously very VERY different and not at all the same! I just think both are good examples of the diversity and complexity of sexuality and attraction!! I'm a trans guy who's also bisexual myself so I felt it important to say this to avoid anyone misunderstanding me!)

You could call people with fetishes/kinks weird or a rare bunch of deviants, and you could claim that their inherent rarity excludes them from your argument that really just boils down to rigid gender existentialism.

And I would be inclined to disagree with your exclusion, I think they're fascinating case studies of the vastness and oddities found within human sexuality!!

I also disagree that just because a group is small, that somehow makes them inconsequential and unworthy of consideration when making such blanket statements about human behaviors and inclinations.

Exceptions to perceived rules are important in collecting data, and like I've stated previously, ESPECIALLY in the case of claiming that half the populace only behaves in one way due to the very nature of their "biological wiring!!"

You'd be laughed out of a room of researchers if you were to present your already flimsy, and highly anecdotal evidence as fact while actively dismissing/outright refusing to acknowledge large groups of people because they don't fit your worldview that only serves to erase nuance.

Now, in the specific case of LGBTQ+ people, you can see these people as exceptions to your rules all you want, but it's important to note that these communities are made up of millions upon millions all around the globe despite making up 9% of the population.

9% seems like a small number, but it's actually quite large! My math may be incorrect so please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's more than 600 million people who are LGBTQ+ worldwide out of 7 billion!!

I unfortunately don't have a % for the amount of people out there with odd fetishes or kinks, but I'd assume there's also a large, albeit considerably smaller portion of people who are as much of a freak as I am in terms of being kinky. Take this bit with a grain of salt though as I don't have any data suggesting such, this is just an assumption on my part.

Anyway, once you open yourself up to these communities, you'll see that sexuality isn't as cut as dry as you once believed it to be and how standards of beauty are more influenced by the society we live in rather than being in our nature.

Human sexuality is actually highly complex!! It's something that I'm very passionate about as someone whose special interest is anthropology and human behavior!

I think it's something everyone should study personally, it's just fun but I think that's also because I'm a bit of a nerd!


3 . It's not just survival of the fittest, it's survival of whoever can work together as seen throughout history and in other social animals who take care of their sick and elderly such as wolves, apes, elephants, and other social animals!

One famous case of social animals caring for one another and accepting the "burden" of caring for a disabled person while struggling to survive themselves-

is a group of cave people continuing to care for their family member even after they became disabled, the skeleton of their disabled family member had multiple cavities because of how often they were fed sweets by said family members.

There's a good video that explains this and other such cases in detail by Trey the Explainer on YouTube by the title of "Disabilities in Prehistory."

There are many, many cases like this throughout history if you were to just have a base level understanding of anthropology! You cannot claim to know how women or men intrinsically behave unless you study and learn from history and the current experiences of women and other minorities you stubbornly and uncritically see as lesser and refuse to hear out because of your baseless preconceived notions.

I bring this point up because the "biologically wired to find xyz attractive" talking point hinges on the idea that evolution only favors one type of survival, when in reality, it's so much more complex than that!!

Everything about humans is so much more complex and to boil it down and simplify it as much as these misogynists do is a disservice to all who study the intricacies of the human mind and how much there is we still don't know about it!

You can look up many such cases! The group that survives are not motivated by selfishness and were definitely not picky with who they fucked, (not to mention that back then when people were dying left and right due to a lack of safety, it's not like they had the choice of being picky with who they mated with to begin with! :V)

No silly! They were often the ones who can help each other out, those are the humans who survived long enough to reproduce.

Humans evolved and as a result, became physically weaker than the strong primates they once were, because evolution favored our minds and usage of tools over the strength and fitness humans had initially started out with.


4 . Women and AFABs (assigned female at birth) are more picky with who they choose to have sex with, not out of superiority or because they're genetically wired to find a select few traits attractive, but out of safety/survival.

Cis men often feel they are owed our bodies by virtue of us being the "lesser" of the two sexes and are more likely to act out violently if they are denied sex/intimacy due to their intense sense of entitlement.

That sense of entitlement usually manifests itself in feeling as though they are owed sex because during their upbringing, boys are often shamed for being virgins or told that they're somehow lesser men if they don't have sex by an arbitrary date. Which is obviously fucked up and false.

They see it in much of the same vein as being intentionally and maliciously deprived of an essential need such as food or water, rather than being turned down for a fun, and casual activity that's supposed to satisfy both participants equally-

And that putrid combination of anger, hatred, painful self-loathing, and entitlement is what often results in women and AFAB people getting murdered, sexually assaulted, or more often than not, both at the same time.

Which is why women and AFABs are more hesitant with who they sleep with, they get murdered more often. There are multiple, publicly available statistics and charts that prove this claim.

However, I feel the need to clarify that cis men are not biologically wired to be more violent, and neither are they more horny than women.

This is my own anecdotal experience, but I offer my experience as well as the explanation as to why women and AFABs don't talk about sex as much as cis men do.

The simple answer to that is women and AFABs are shamed for "high body counts" due to the intense purity culture of America perpetuated by the religious right, insecure teenage boys, and pathetic men who never grew up that don't want to have sex with someone with previous sexual encounters because they fear it would expose their own inadequacy in bed.

There's a lot more to this topic, but I don't want to spend all day writing this so you can look into the topic of how society demonizes women and AFABs with high sex drives which causes them to stay silent about how horny and lonely they really are :V

Women draw and watch porn too and can become addicted in much the same way cis men can, mind blowing, shocking really, who could have seen this coming? Women are people too?? wow!?!?!

Anyway, here's my experiences, skip over if you want I guess, or don't, I don't give a shit.

Being inexperienced sexually is really no big deal, sex is a skill and you'll learn as you go. Just apologize for being bad at it and move on, as someone who's been through that awkwardness, the other person you're engaging with likely went through the same thing too at some point so I'm sure they'll understand.

It's really as simple as communicating :/

I'm not on hormones and yet, despite being AFAB I have a very high libido and I've had sex with other AFAB people who are equally, if not more horny than I am.

And I'm 5'1, not at all conventionally attractive, depressed, weird, autistic, and fucked up. Yet I've still had sex with people who were so gorgeous they could be a model if they wanted to.

Granted, I haven't had sex with anyone other than my boyfriend since we got back together, but still! If a fucked up gremlin freak like me could get some, then the issue probably has to do with how you treat women and not your appearance.

It's also probably not because you're shy, shy men are cute asf ngl.

(Though I am not saying that there aren't shallow people out there, there are.
But if you wouldn't date a fat woman or a tall woman, wouldn't that make you just as shitty and shallow as the women you hate? That same insufferable shallowness that has only ever made you miserable? Wouldn't that make you part of the problem too? Have you ever considered that those same women who you dehumanize and consider low value MIGHT feel the same anger and vitriol towards you for being so disgustingly judgemental?-

-I'm 87 pounds and I think fat (esp fat, I like soft surfaces to lay my head on after a stressful day), muscular, and thin men, women, and non-binary people are all sexy as fuck imo so you really have no excuse and you can't hide behind the "biologically wired" bullshit like a coward, just admit you're just as shitty as the tinder women you criticize ffs!)

Women and AFABs aren't a separate species. You can talk with us as you would your guy friends. There's no secret to women and AFABs and anyone who tells you there is, is a scammer and a grifter who makes bank off of taking advantage of profoundly lonely men.

There is no secret to women because they're all very different from one another, because
*drumroll*
THEY'RE PEOPLE TOO!!!

So in other words,

The notion that cis men are uncontrollable, rabid animals with no sense of self control around attractive women is downright insulting, don't you think? To be told all your life that you have the mental capacity and self control of an ape who fell off a tree and bumped their head one too many times?

It's even more insulting when we take into account how cis men often use their supposed "biological wiring" as an excuse to downplay and avoid accountability for r*pe or just being a general sex pest.

But what's even more laughable is how often this talking point of cis men supposedly being on the same wavelength as savage apes co-exists with the idea that men are biologically more logical and therefore, more reasonable than women and therefore, are more worthy of respect.

How is a man shackled to his vices, a man who claims to be logical while also refusing to listen to any viewpoint other than his own, a man who will only hear what he likes and dismisses what he doesn't as exceptions to the rule or as lies, how is this man in any way logical or reasonable?

Simple.
He is human, and as humans we have emotions, flaws, and that's not a bad thing. We are not inherently evil for our flaws, but it's bad when our flaws and emotions hurt others or uphold harmful systems that hurt both AMAB and AFAB folk in different ways.

We all just need to make a collective effort to keep ourselves in check, and addressing misogyny is one step towards that.

There is no paradox of tolerance, you cannot have true tolerance without being intolerant of viewpoints that justify viewing those which you do not understand as biologically inferior, or as detrimental to the perceived default.
Too long didn't read after "misogyny". Plenty of misandry on the forum too. Half of your arguments can be answered by reading any peer reviewed paper on evolutionary biology and how certain behaviours of men and women are wired in it

4 ." Women and AFABs (assigned female at birth) are more picky with who they choose to have sex with, not out of superiority or because they're genetically wired to find a select few traits attractive, but out of safety/survival.»

You realise survival and safety is the reason why females are attracted to those males. What is safety? Physical strength and abundance of resources. Same reason why women prefer rich men now. It's all literally biological


«There are many, many cases like this throughout history if you were to just have a base level understanding of anthropology! You cannot claim to know how women or men intrinsically behave unless you study and learn from history and the current experiences of women and other minorities you stubbornly and uncritically see as lesser and refuse to hear out because of your baseless preconceived notions.»


Ah, good old anthropology. What's next? Sociology too? None of these leftist social sciences are any good at explaining or describing the amount of psychological and evolutionary behavioural data we already have at hand to explain everything. It's not just "culture" or socialization
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: breezeboy
Scattered-Soul

Scattered-Soul

It was an indescribable pain
Oct 2, 2023
158
My brain's total crap at the moment so my reply won't be very extensive or that profound but I still wanted to say something because I feel awful for you OP and I'm sorry for the terrible replies that have been left here. I've no idea why you even engaged in a convo with that one person who claims to favor "facts over feelings" (yet is fully convinced that misogyny isn't a thing and that Andrew Tate who's a convicted rapist and sex trafficker is actually innocent lol). That's the same person who made a thread about how killing your entire family before committing suicide is actually an act of love and who fully believes that he's allowed to decide his wife and children's fate because he owns them, he things they're his property. And he was dead serious too so I think that should tell you enough.

I joined this forum only few months ago so I can't say if misogyny has increased but I've definitely witnessed it. I mostly end up rolling my eyes and keeping to myself since I'm not here to debate people like that and I don't have the energy either.

Seriously though. I don't understand the problem. This is a thread where someone points to supposed increase in mysoginy on this board, mentioning Andrew Tate talking points and you have members in this thread defending that guy teeth and nail and making an entire debate on how he isn't actually that much of a problem and your issue is me providing comfort to someone who is obviously upset (as anyone should be) after reading that discussion and me giving a supportive emote to this person and not the people defending an actual mysoginist who has a real-life impact on millions of men around the world?

I just want to inform everyone again that this guy claims women belong to men in relationships and how rape victims must bear responsibility for their attacks. Talking points by the way which equate rule violations in this forum, before anyone starts defending them here.

And: if you wonder why I give a reaction to a certain member, you can just ask me. There is no need to create unnecessary drama about it. I already had to defend myself for hours and hours when I gave FuneralCry a like a while ago and I find it very concerning how I can't even use this forum like a normal member anymore because oh no I'm a mod so me reacting to someone definitely must imply I support violence towards men? Okay.
You know, I saw that person's response earlier and 1) I immediately knew what your intention was by leaving a hug reaction, I feel like the only way for it to go over someone's head is if the only thing they care about is the part that affects them directly 2) I agree with all of your points, I thought the same because genuinely, you see people defending Andrew Tate, being misogynistic etc and you don't feel the need to speak against that and that doesn't make you wanna leave the forum but one single person who's clearly been hurt by this many times saying that Andrew Tate lovers and whatnot should be eradicated does it for you? It really shows what this person prioritizes and as much as I wanna be sympathetic and compassionate towards everyone, that just left a bitter taste in my mouth.
 
Spades

Spades

he/him
Jul 7, 2023
45
I
Too long didn't read after "misogyny". Plenty of misandry on the forum too. Half of your arguments can be answered by reading any peer reviewed paper on evolutionary biology and how certain behaviours of men and women are wired in it

4 ." Women and AFABs (assigned female at birth) are more picky with who they choose to have sex with, not out of superiority or because they're genetically wired to find a select few traits attractive, but out of safety/survival.»

You realise survival and safety is the reason why females are attracted to those males. What is safety? Physical strength and abundance of resources. Same reason why women prefer rich men now. It's all literally biological


«There are many, many cases like this throughout history if you were to just have a base level understanding of anthropology! You cannot claim to know how women or men intrinsically behave unless you study and learn from history and the current experiences of women and other minorities you stubbornly and uncritically see as lesser and refuse to hear out because of your baseless preconceived notions.»


Ah, good old anthropology. What's next? Sociology too? None of these leftist social sciences are any good at explaining or describing the amount of psychological and evolutionary behavioural data we already have at hand to explain everything. It's not just "culture" or socialization
I don't know anyone who wants to date a rich person because they tend to have the maturity and ego of a child. If anything, I hear more about how shitty they are.

Sure, that's anecdotal, but what you're saying is too.

My boyfriend makes less than me, but we're a team. That's what relationships are, you work together and put in equal effort to survive. You make yourself vulnerable by putting yourself out there like that, but that's the risk.

I don't want to be taken care of, I can take care of myself, and I make sure to contribute in any way I can much like everyone should if they're able.

Anthropology does take into account behavioral data though? What would it be without that? Sorry if this reply isn't as concise, I just woke up and I've got a bad case of brain fog right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LunarLight
E

Ernest1964

Specialist
Jan 6, 2023
336
I'm posting this in the suicide discussion portion of this board rather than the off topic section because I see it the most here and I feel it's important to call attention to as I'm sure this also makes a lot of other members uncomfortable as well.

This is a suicide discussion board that has a large base of both women and queer people, and for years, it's given marginalized groups the platform to vent about suicidality and given compassion to those who would otherwise have received none, and lended ears to voices who would have remained unheard.

Which is why I think it's an important issue to address! I'm likely not well equipped to discuss this as I'm still learning about such topics, but man, someone's gotta say something, you know?

You just have to nip it in the bud sometimes..

This is an open discussion so if you have any counter points or anything you wish to add that I missed or skimmed over, please do so.

And if I got anything wrong, then please correct me and I will apologize.

I'm again, still very new to this all and my hands are shaking as I type this. I hate confrontation but this has really been bugging me lately and I can't not say something otherwise it'll just continue to happen.

Some parts of this post may be worded a bit harshly to prove a point, though these moments are few and far between, I tried my best not to be overly mean but please let me know if I've crossed a line.

If a moderator takes issue with this post, also please let me know so I can refrain from posting things like this in the future!


So, without further a do..

I started lurking this forum about 2 years ago and I officially joined in early July. Soon after that I took a bit of a break from this forum and I only recently became active again.

And over the course of the time I've been here, I've noticed an uptick in misogyny which has only been steadily increasing since late 2022.

I now see unsubstantiated and quite frankly, ludacris talking points pulled straight from right-wing podcasts such as Fresh and Fit and famous sex trafficker Andrew Tate-

By men telling women what they do and do not find attractive instead of simply listening because they think all women that live outside the box of stereotypical cisnormative femininity are either lying or just an exception to their arbitrary rules that they treat as gospel.

Whereas before, I'd only encountered misogyny once or thrice here.

I don't believe this to be an incel issue as they've always been a part of this forum to some capacity. The incels who used to be here weren't misogynists and were actually pretty reasonable and understanding.

They were simply lonely men who didn't know where to start or even how to talk to people generally. And that loneliness has become all too common unfortunately amongst all people regardless of gender due to cities not being walkable and public places to hang out becoming all the more scarce.

Which has resulted in the sudden rise of lonely men, women, and enbies. There are many articles about this topic that I'd love to discuss in detail but this is already going to be a long post as is,,

Anway, sorry about that tangent, as I was saying-

Now, I constantly see new threads popping up with men discussing how women are biologically wired for xyz and other odd talking points with absolutely no proof for their claims beyond Tinder studies that fail to take into account that:

1 . There are more men than women that use Tinder.

2 . This worldview that hinges on a select few traits being desirable falls apart the second you factor in LGBTQ+ folk. Bisexuals, lesbians, gays, asexuals, etc etc!

Hell, that's all without taking into account the many kink/fetish circles where people can be attracted to robots, objects, watching others or themselves gain weight, being tied up, feet, hands, etc!!

(BTW, I'm not equating LGBTQ+ people to people with kinks or fetishes!! They're obviously very VERY different and not at all the same! I just think both are good examples of the diversity and complexity of sexuality and attraction!! I'm a trans guy who's also bisexual myself so I felt it important to say this to avoid anyone misunderstanding me!)

You could call people with fetishes/kinks weird or a rare bunch of deviants, and you could claim that their inherent rarity excludes them from your argument that really just boils down to rigid gender existentialism.

And I would be inclined to disagree with your exclusion, I think they're fascinating case studies of the vastness and oddities found within human sexuality!!

I also disagree that just because a group is small, that somehow makes them inconsequential and unworthy of consideration when making such blanket statements about human behaviors and inclinations.

Exceptions to perceived rules are important in collecting data, and like I've stated previously, ESPECIALLY in the case of claiming that half the populace only behaves in one way due to the very nature of their "biological wiring!!"

You'd be laughed out of a room of researchers if you were to present your already flimsy, and highly anecdotal evidence as fact while actively dismissing/outright refusing to acknowledge large groups of people because they don't fit your worldview that only serves to erase nuance.

Now, in the specific case of LGBTQ+ people, you can see these people as exceptions to your rules all you want, but it's important to note that these communities are made up of millions upon millions all around the globe despite making up 9% of the population.

9% seems like a small number, but it's actually quite large! My math may be incorrect so please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's more than 600 million people who are LGBTQ+ worldwide out of 7 billion!!

I unfortunately don't have a % for the amount of people out there with odd fetishes or kinks, but I'd assume there's also a large, albeit considerably smaller portion of people who are as much of a freak as I am in terms of being kinky. Take this bit with a grain of salt though as I don't have any data suggesting such, this is just an assumption on my part.

Anyway, once you open yourself up to these communities, you'll see that sexuality isn't as cut as dry as you once believed it to be and how standards of beauty are more influenced by the society we live in rather than being in our nature.

Human sexuality is actually highly complex!! It's something that I'm very passionate about as someone whose special interest is anthropology and human behavior!

I think it's something everyone should study personally, it's just fun but I think that's also because I'm a bit of a nerd!


3 . It's not just survival of the fittest, it's survival of whoever can work together as seen throughout history and in other social animals who take care of their sick and elderly such as wolves, apes, elephants, and other social animals!

One famous case of social animals caring for one another and accepting the "burden" of caring for a disabled person while struggling to survive themselves-

is a group of cave people continuing to care for their family member even after they became disabled, the skeleton of their disabled family member had multiple cavities because of how often they were fed sweets by said family members.

There's a good video that explains this and other such cases in detail by Trey the Explainer on YouTube by the title of "Disabilities in Prehistory."

There are many, many cases like this throughout history if you were to just have a base level understanding of anthropology! You cannot claim to know how women or men intrinsically behave unless you study and learn from history and the current experiences of women and other minorities you stubbornly and uncritically see as lesser and refuse to hear out because of your baseless preconceived notions.

I bring this point up because the "biologically wired to find xyz attractive" talking point hinges on the idea that evolution only favors one type of survival, when in reality, it's so much more complex than that!!

Everything about humans is so much more complex and to boil it down and simplify it as much as these misogynists do is a disservice to all who study the intricacies of the human mind and how much there is we still don't know about it!

You can look up many such cases! The group that survives are not motivated by selfishness and were definitely not picky with who they fucked, (not to mention that back then when people were dying left and right due to a lack of safety, it's not like they had the choice of being picky with who they mated with to begin with! :V)

No silly! They were often the ones who can help each other out, those are the humans who survived long enough to reproduce.

Humans evolved and as a result, became physically weaker than the strong primates they once were, because evolution favored our minds and usage of tools over the strength and fitness humans had initially started out with.


4 . Women and AFABs (assigned female at birth) are more picky with who they choose to have sex with, not out of superiority or because they're genetically wired to find a select few traits attractive, but out of safety/survival.

Cis men often feel they are owed our bodies by virtue of us being the "lesser" of the two sexes and are more likely to act out violently if they are denied sex/intimacy due to their intense sense of entitlement.

That sense of entitlement usually manifests itself in feeling as though they are owed sex because during their upbringing, boys are often shamed for being virgins or told that they're somehow lesser men if they don't have sex by an arbitrary date. Which is obviously fucked up and false.

They see it in much of the same vein as being intentionally and maliciously deprived of an essential need such as food or water, rather than being turned down for a fun, and casual activity that's supposed to satisfy both participants equally-

And that putrid combination of anger, hatred, painful self-loathing, and entitlement is what often results in women and AFAB people getting murdered, sexually assaulted, or more often than not, both at the same time.

Which is why women and AFABs are more hesitant with who they sleep with, they get murdered more often. There are multiple, publicly available statistics and charts that prove this claim.

However, I feel the need to clarify that cis men are not biologically wired to be more violent, and neither are they more horny than women.

This is my own anecdotal experience, but I offer my experience as well as the explanation as to why women and AFABs don't talk about sex as much as cis men do.

The simple answer to that is women and AFABs are shamed for "high body counts" due to the intense purity culture of America perpetuated by the religious right, insecure teenage boys, and pathetic men who never grew up that don't want to have sex with someone with previous sexual encounters because they fear it would expose their own inadequacy in bed.

There's a lot more to this topic, but I don't want to spend all day writing this so you can look into the topic of how society demonizes women and AFABs with high sex drives which causes them to stay silent about how horny and lonely they really are :V

Women draw and watch porn too and can become addicted in much the same way cis men can, mind blowing, shocking really, who could have seen this coming? Women are people too?? wow!?!?!

Anyway, here's my experiences, skip over if you want I guess, or don't, I don't give a shit.

Being inexperienced sexually is really no big deal, sex is a skill and you'll learn as you go. Just apologize for being bad at it and move on, as someone who's been through that awkwardness, the other person you're engaging with likely went through the same thing too at some point so I'm sure they'll understand.

It's really as simple as communicating :/

I'm not on hormones and yet, despite being AFAB I have a very high libido and I've had sex with other AFAB people who are equally, if not more horny than I am.

And I'm 5'1, not at all conventionally attractive, depressed, weird, autistic, and fucked up. Yet I've still had sex with people who were so gorgeous they could be a model if they wanted to.

Granted, I haven't had sex with anyone other than my boyfriend since we got back together, but still! If a fucked up gremlin freak like me could get some, then the issue probably has to do with how you treat women and not your appearance.

It's also probably not because you're shy, shy men are cute asf ngl.

(Though I am not saying that there aren't shallow people out there, there are.
But if you wouldn't date a fat woman or a tall woman, wouldn't that make you just as shitty and shallow as the women you hate? That same insufferable shallowness that has only ever made you miserable? Wouldn't that make you part of the problem too? Have you ever considered that those same women who you dehumanize and consider low value MIGHT feel the same anger and vitriol towards you for being so disgustingly judgemental?-

-I'm 87 pounds and I think fat (esp fat, I like soft surfaces to lay my head on after a stressful day), muscular, and thin men, women, and non-binary people are all sexy as fuck imo so you really have no excuse and you can't hide behind the "biologically wired" bullshit like a coward, just admit you're just as shitty as the tinder women you criticize ffs!)

Women and AFABs aren't a separate species. You can talk with us as you would your guy friends. There's no secret to women and AFABs and anyone who tells you there is, is a scammer and a grifter who makes bank off of taking advantage of profoundly lonely men.

There is no secret to women because they're all very different from one another, because
*drumroll*
THEY'RE PEOPLE TOO!!!

So in other words,

The notion that cis men are uncontrollable, rabid animals with no sense of self control around attractive women is downright insulting, don't you think? To be told all your life that you have the mental capacity and self control of an ape who fell off a tree and bumped their head one too many times?

It's even more insulting when we take into account how cis men often use their supposed "biological wiring" as an excuse to downplay and avoid accountability for r*pe or just being a general sex pest.

But what's even more laughable is how often this talking point of cis men supposedly being on the same wavelength as savage apes co-exists with the idea that men are biologically more logical and therefore, more reasonable than women and therefore, are more worthy of respect.

How is a man shackled to his vices, a man who claims to be logical while also refusing to listen to any viewpoint other than his own, a man who will only hear what he likes and dismisses what he doesn't as exceptions to the rule or as lies, how is this man in any way logical or reasonable?

Simple.
He is human, and as humans we have emotions, flaws, and that's not a bad thing. We are not inherently evil for our flaws, but it's bad when our flaws and emotions hurt others or uphold harmful systems that hurt both AMAB and AFAB folk in different ways.

We all just need to make a collective effort to keep ourselves in check, and addressing misogyny is one step towards that.

There is no paradox of tolerance, you cannot have true tolerance without being intolerant of viewpoints that justify viewing those which you do not understand as biologically inferior, or as detrimental to the perceived default.
OMG!!! TL:DR
 
D

DreamEnd

Enlightened
Aug 4, 2022
1,851
I

I don't know anyone who wants to date a rich person because they tend to have the maturity and ego of a child. If anything, I hear more about how shitty they are.

Sure, that's anecdotal, but what you're saying is too.

My boyfriend makes less than me, but we're a team. That's what relationships are, you work together and put in equal effort to survive. You make yourself vulnerable by putting yourself out there like that, but that's the risk.

I don't want to be taken care of, I can take care of myself, and I make sure to contribute in any way I can much like everyone should if they're able.

Anthropology does take into account behavioral data though? What would it be without that? Sorry if this reply isn't as concise, I just woke up and I've got a bad case of brain fog right now.
I'm sorry but saying women don't want to date rich men is completely untrue and unsupported by data we have on hypergamy. Women are more likely to date above their wealth and social status, men often date down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: breezeboy
casual_existence

casual_existence

Student
Jul 29, 2023
192
I'm sorry but saying women don't want to date rich men is completely untrue and unsupported by data we have on hypergamy. Women are more likely to date above their wealth and social status, men often date down.
I mean only a fool would not date someone with money. Yet we don't know if they have a good life together, whether they stay together for long, whether they'll make good parents, etc. If women date men with money then why not men? Are men not interested in money? Even though they tend to be at the top of organizations and make more money? Unless their desire for money is selfish. In which case they care more about money than women so these women aren't even worth dating or would be impossible to date because you may not meet their needs. You wanna date a materialistic person? Be materialistic yourself!

Even if we accepted hypergamy in women as to why some women won't date poor men it's not like men are somehow blocked off from dating women with money. This is already flipping since more women are getting higher degrees than men. So we'll see how this pans out for dating but I doubt things will change much. Some people will be angry that they can't get no bitches and will pull numbers out of thin air to support their cause. Maybe join one of those religions where polygamy is everything.
 
D

DreamEnd

Enlightened
Aug 4, 2022
1,851
I mean only a fool would not date someone with money. Yet we don't know if they have a good life together, whether they stay together for long, whether they'll make good parents, etc. If women date men with money then why not men? Are men not interested in money? Even though they tend to be at the top of organizations and make more money? Unless their desire for money is selfish. In which case they care more about money than women so these women aren't even worth dating or would be impossible to date because you may not meet their needs. You wanna date a materialistic person? Be materialistic yourself!

Even if we accepted hypergamy in women as to why some women won't date poor men it's not like men are somehow blocked off from dating women with money. This is already flipping since more women are getting higher degrees than men. So we'll see how this pans out for dating but I doubt things will change much. Some people will be angry that they can't get no bitches and will pull numbers out of thin air to support their cause. Maybe join one of those religions where polygamy is everything.
Men absolutely do date women with money I agree! But it doesn't matter to them as much as status and wealth matters to women. This is because of hypergamy but also because of the fact that men are expected to be the providers which I disagree with
 
Spades

Spades

he/him
Jul 7, 2023
45
I'm sorry but saying women don't want to date rich men is completely untrue and unsupported by data we have on hypergamy. Women are more likely to date above their wealth and social status, men often date down.
The only study on hypergamy I found was from the university of Michigan by Jeffrey A Simpson by the name of "women's mate preferences"

And the other studies on the site that were related to that study focused on the idea of hunter gatherer societies, which has been debunked.

Men and women hunted (obviously when the woman was not pregnant), and men and women gathered, they simply did whatever they could to ensure survival.

I don't have the time to debunk all the claims within that study, I'm very tired and I honestly just want to go back bed. Maybe I'll come back to this discussion, I don't know.

I'm sorry, I do want to talk about this but I need to rest before I can do so properly.
 
SexyIncél

SexyIncél

🍭my lollipop brings the feminists to my candyshop
Aug 16, 2022
1,400
Sure, Andrew Tate's a monster. But people listen to him because he gets to talk about how you're a slave & desperately need to escape. The mainstream media carries him because he won't talk about organizing to end the slavery. He just makes you into a harder working slave in the system

Just like him: pretended to be his camgirls in chatrooms, submitting his mind to men's sexual fantasies. Damaged his body in literal fights, till his retinas almost popped out

So yeah, I needed a bit of motivation porn today, and you guys reminded me to look at his tweets. I'm in a hell dimension & sometimes get inspired by its monsters
 
  • Like
Reactions: DreamEnd
Spike Spiegel

Spike Spiegel

Member
Sep 26, 2022
65
I think you are conflating things you don't like, either for political reasons or personal reasons with the blanket term misogyny. Further to blanket someone as not worth listing too because you don't agree with them does in theory stifle lots of conversation. I think you will find people from all backgrounds use this platform and attacking right wing or left wing won't really get you anywhere on here besides endless circular reasoning debates. I don't associate with either of the main two parties but language you use is enough to piss off one or the other without really giving credence besides I don't like them because of XYZ. While I think we can all agree that misogyny is bad and should never make someone uncomfortable to the point they don't post on here. This forum is good at giving everybody its own little corner to curate their people and their crowd to help them on whatever journey they are on. Also off topic but the term CIS has gotten attention recently as potentially a hate word, just food for thought.

Interesting post but I don't believe the issue is as pervasive as you make it out. This forum has hosted many interesting philosophical, biological, spiritual etc. conversations. I have found a better exchange of educated thought on here then I have during my experiences in higher academia and I really mean that. People on here say what they want and feel, well because they might not be here tomorrow. I think that truth is liberating. Granted I don't want that freedom to be used to hurt people. But I don't think thought should have a governor put on it because it may bother people on here. I find the admins do a really good job at keeping this forum a well respected place to express how they feel. If you really think this is a issue on here, you could always take it up with one of the MODS. However like I said I really think they do a good job keeping this site a respectful place.
 
Tears in Rain

Tears in Rain

..............
Dec 12, 2023
860
But just wanted to say that regardless of the veracity of OP's post which has been stringently criticized, it is disgusting how much of an underlying dismissive sentiment there is underpinning the responses.

There is a very compassionate and articulate response that is warranted when one raises the issue of misogyny. Whether we can expect this response or not on a suicide forum is a moot point when the fact is that sexism drives many people to the point of suicide and it does need to change.
Agree with that sentiment about the dismissiveness of the reactions to the OP. It's one thing to disagree with someone, it's another to just pettily, snarkily dismiss their views.

There are luckily only a small number of women haters here or they get weeded out fast.
I agree. I rarely venture into the off-topic section, but here on the main forum, there doesn't seem to be many women-haters. But low-level misogyny does rear it's head now and again. But it's not that frequent. Most of the guys I've come across on the forum who see themselves as incels don't take their shit out on women. But a minority do, and they're usually the angry personalities, from what I've seen.


But for practicalities like relationships & sex, the manosphere currently beats the pants out of any other group. Mainstream pop feminists have terrible values.
I had never heard of the manosphere before you mentioned it on this forum. (I'm a male in my 40s, so I'm probably considered ancient to younger folk here). I had to look it up. Don't think I'll be venturing anywhere near it again!

Seriously though. I don't understand the problem. This is a thread where someone points to supposed increase in mysoginy on this board, mentioning Andrew Tate talking points and you have members in this thread defending that guy teeth and nail.
Yeah, I don't think any civilised conversation about anything should include that clown.

I don't know anyone who wants to date a rich person because they tend to have the maturity and ego of a child. If anything, I hear more about how shitty they are.
I agree with a lot that you say, but humans are obsessed with status. It's hard-wired into us. Look at the animal kingdom to see what a large role status plays.
It's obviously not true across the board, but the reason so many immature, ugly rich men pull beautiful women is money and status.
Status is one of our deep-rooted 'programs'. It's why people obsess over celebrity and royalty.
 
Raindancer

Raindancer

Experienced
Nov 4, 2023
252
OK, not sure this is the right place to post this but I am going to throw this out here.

I've noticed a few threads asking for specific topics or speech to be curtailed. One of the things I have greatly appreciated about this forum is we can mostly speak freely as long as there is no abuse or harassment. I am a huge believer in free speech especially when you disagree with it. I am a conservative Christian so I feel I am in the minority and have felt stung many a time by things said which is completely OK. I have always enjoyed great debates and conversations with people who disagree as long as it stays civil.

One thought that may help, is many topics are discussed here which either can't be proven(ie religion) and are our own experiences and emotions. Maybe coming from a place of "I feel X" or "I personally believe this" would help, rather than stating something as fact that you cannot prove. It helps us take responsibility for our feelings and words but allows for dissenting opinions. Just my thoughts on this and some other topics that have come up recently.
 
D

DreamEnd

Enlightened
Aug 4, 2022
1,851
Agree with that sentiment about the dismissiveness of the reactions to the OP. It's one thing to disagree with someone, it's another to just pettily, snarkily dismiss their views.


I agree. I rarely venture into the off-topic section, but here on the main forum, there doesn't seem to be many women-haters. But low-level misogyny does rear it's head now and again. But it's not that frequent. Most of the guys I've come across on the forum who see themselves as incels don't take their shit out on women. But a minority do, and they're usually the angry personalities, from what I've seen.



I had never heard of the manosphere before you mentioned it on this forum. (I'm a male in my 40s, so I'm probably considered ancient to younger folk here). I had to look it up. Don't think I'll be venturing anywhere near it again!


Yeah, I don't think any civilised conversation about anything should include that clown.


I agree with a lot that you say, but humans are obsessed with status. It's hard-wired into us. Look at the animal kingdom to see what a large role status plays.
It's obviously not true across the board, but the reason so many immature, ugly rich men pull beautiful women is money and status.
Status is one of our deep-rooted 'programs'. It's why people obsess over celebrity and royalty.
Well a lot of the times advocating for men's rights will seem misogynistic to some people so while the manosphere does have some toxic ideas in it, there is no use in disregarding it completely, just like feminism
 
FallingGrace

FallingGrace

Secretary of something
Mar 11, 2020
141
You know what? Maybe it's a good thing the misogynists are… here, and not in a place of power or authority, as awful as that may sound. But can we get a separate space where the girls and the gays can hang out? I feel uncomfy.

But in all seriousness, you all slept on the acknowledgement of our overwhelming LGBTQIA+ membership. We have so many trans brothers, sisters and siblings that are struggling just to survive day to day on this forum. We have AFAB members who have suffered horrific sexual abuse. POC members that have suffered racial discrimination in the workplace, and repeated medical negligence. Not getting sloppy toppy from your anime waifu doesn't really compare to the struggles other minority groups experience and it bears repeating.
 
Spike Spiegel

Spike Spiegel

Member
Sep 26, 2022
65
OK, not sure this is the right place to post this but I am going to throw this out here.

I've noticed a few threads asking for specific topics or speech to be curtailed. One of the things I have greatly appreciated about this forum is we can mostly speak freely as long as there is no abuse or harassment. I am a huge believer in free speech especially when you disagree with it. I am a conservative Christian so I feel I am in the minority and have felt stung many a time by things said which is completely OK. I have always enjoyed great debates and conversations with people who disagree as long as it stays civil.

One thought that may help, is many topics are discussed here which either can't be proven(ie religion) and are our own experiences and emotions. Maybe coming from a place of "I feel X" or "I personally believe this" would help, rather than stating something as fact that you cannot prove. It helps us take responsibility for our feelings and words but allows for dissenting opinions. Just my thoughts on this and some other topics that have come up recently.
Well said, the more I reread the post the more I think she is actually invalidating some men's experience by trying to make them feel bad if they relate to X person that they say is bad. Its unhealthy to just view those we don't agree with as wrong and feel the need to police it. At any point on this forum if you don't like something you can respond to it and poke holes in it or make your point known. This person would seemingly not want that discussion, but a blanket removal of some topics all together. I'm actually relieved to see the majority of comments disagreeing with this persons overall assessment. Gives me hope this forum will stay true to its original principles and culture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zel and Raindancer
D

DreamEnd

Enlightened
Aug 4, 2022
1,851
You know what? Maybe it's a good thing the misogynists are… here, and not in a place of power or authority, as awful as that may sound. But can we get a separate space where the girls and the gays can hang out? I feel uncomfy.

But in all seriousness, you all slept on the acknowledgement of our overwhelming LGBTQIA+ membership. We have so many trans brothers, sisters and siblings that are struggling just to survive day to day on this forum. We have AFAB members who have suffered horrific sexual abuse. POC members that have suffered racial discrimination in the workplace, and repeated medical negligence. Not getting sloppy toppy from your anime waifu doesn't really compare to the struggles other minority groups experience and it bears repeating.
everyone goes through different things. No one has it worse just by belonging to a different group. Especially here in sasu
 
FallingGrace

FallingGrace

Secretary of something
Mar 11, 2020
141
It's an interesting discussion to have. I have butted heads with a couple of incels on here. It's interesting to note that these incels have also had other disturbing "flavours" that they made no attempt to hide. Mainly, nazism and pedophilia. They tend to represent a litany of more harmful opinions, often targeting minorities. With that being said, SaSu can offer empathy incel forums severely lack.
 
tiger b

tiger b

AI without the I
Oct 24, 2023
1,239
But in all seriousness, you all slept on the acknowledgement of our overwhelming LGBTQIA+ membership.
'All'? Bit of a sweeping statement, there.

We have so many trans brothers, sisters and siblings that are struggling just to survive day to day on this forum. We have AFAB members who have suffered horrific sexual abuse. POC members that have suffered racial discrimination in the workplace, and repeated medical negligence. Not getting sloppy toppy from your anime waifu doesn't really compare to the struggles other minority groups experience and it bears repeating.
Personally, I will never be able to fully convey by words the effect discrimination has had on me since birth, and the ridiculousness of how people can behave out of their own stupid - utterly, utterly stupid, I have to add - misperceptions.

But a semblance of unity can not or ever be achieved by prioritising one group's dreadful suffering over another's, and trivialising or demonising anyone else's. Division cannot bring any real unity. It will only bring more division and hatred. That's if the intention is to truly build a society of caring, supportive brothers, sisters...people...rather than passing ships, part of a facade paying mere lip service to ideals when it's just rendered doublethink and doublespeak in practice.

Far easier to achieve the second. Well, as long as it looks bright and shiny on social media, eh.

If the idea of equality is practical, all 'groups' must be brought at least somewhat willingly to the table to share the meal together. But there's two who beg to differ, and they're as old as Humanity itself, good old Power and Control.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

N
Replies
9
Views
202
Offtopic
noname223
N
Dili
Replies
32
Views
1K
Suicide Discussion
Linda
Linda
N
Replies
0
Views
88
Suicide Discussion
noname223
N