
Namelesa
Trapped in this Suffering
- Sep 21, 2024
- 1,589
I don't know if I would call myself a full pro mortalist but I am definitely not against it and believe in it partially. I assume the definition would be most moral to kill all life instantly and painlessly to prevent further suffering if that was possible. I am somewhat iffy about killing innocent happy lives unconsentally but if its painlessly and instantly and after is non-existence then no actual harm is put onto them and for the lives that want to die, they get their wish granted and no longer have to suffer so to me its a morally good or neutral viewpoint.Also, you said that you were a pro mortalist. I'm curious as to how you would define this term as I see different people defining it differently. I'm also curious as to whether you heard about jiwoon hwang. He made a paper on pro mortalism before he went through a horrific suicide attempt which failed and thus caused doctors to prolong his misery for a few more months before he finally got the release from life via death. I feel so bad for him but I'm glad that he's at peace now
I mostly base this off that I think death at its best is the best thing to happen when at its worst its a neutral thing and life at its best is a good thing but at its worst is the pure torture.
588