TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
Several years ago I wrote a thread (around the year 2020) about how when one blocks/ignores/deletes another person from social media, it is akin to metaphorically killing said person (without actually killing said person) as it means that said person has just cut the target out of their life and (likely) to never have contact with them again, which is similar to that as the target person being dead to the initiator's perspective (even if the target is still alive out there in the world). It is also very likely that the initiator will not see said person again.
Anyways, so this article revisits that thread that I wrote and focuses more on the fact that it isn't death itself that pro-lifers are problematic with (they are, but there is something more central to this point), but the fact that their atavistic morals and view on life are threatened. In other words, in their eyes, it's like their (delusional) world view is being challenged and at risk of being shattered, disproven, and having to face the ugly truth so they do anything to validate and protect it, even at the cost of others' well-being.
This includes, but is not limited to invasive, intrusive intervention against one's will (CTB prevention measures such as but not limited to being locked up in a psych ward, detained against one's will, and treatment against one's will and more). Additionally, they even go as far as to gaslight, question, and inquire about anyone that has ANY hint of CTB ideation or behaviors, or signs, while all failing to address the underlying cause (pushing the onus onto the sufferer to figure it out). Then, they validate themselves by patting themselves on their backs for playing hero and intervening (even if the outcome isn't the best and leaves said person in a worse predicament – ostracization, loss of rights, financial problems, and other consequences). Sure, while their atavistic morals are often religious in nature, some are just terrified of reality that they feel the need to (preemptively) unjustly and inappropriately suppress another's freedom just to protect their own views and morals.
So in other words, if they (the pro-lifers) had no prior knowledge of said person CTB'ing or dying from CTB, they wouldn't have felt a loss. In a sense, what they (the pro-lifers) don't know, can't hurt them (the pro-lifers), because it doesn't threaten their world view and of course, their ego. They also do not care about improving the said person's (sufferer) quality of life as much as it is to just pad their egos, but that goes without saying. After all, it's often just about their (pro-lifers') ego and validating their beliefs and worldview; in other words, it's all about them (and their egos). It is the epitome of selfishness, arrogance, and cruelty.
@Forever Sleep @FuneralCry
Anyways, so this article revisits that thread that I wrote and focuses more on the fact that it isn't death itself that pro-lifers are problematic with (they are, but there is something more central to this point), but the fact that their atavistic morals and view on life are threatened. In other words, in their eyes, it's like their (delusional) world view is being challenged and at risk of being shattered, disproven, and having to face the ugly truth so they do anything to validate and protect it, even at the cost of others' well-being.
This includes, but is not limited to invasive, intrusive intervention against one's will (CTB prevention measures such as but not limited to being locked up in a psych ward, detained against one's will, and treatment against one's will and more). Additionally, they even go as far as to gaslight, question, and inquire about anyone that has ANY hint of CTB ideation or behaviors, or signs, while all failing to address the underlying cause (pushing the onus onto the sufferer to figure it out). Then, they validate themselves by patting themselves on their backs for playing hero and intervening (even if the outcome isn't the best and leaves said person in a worse predicament – ostracization, loss of rights, financial problems, and other consequences). Sure, while their atavistic morals are often religious in nature, some are just terrified of reality that they feel the need to (preemptively) unjustly and inappropriately suppress another's freedom just to protect their own views and morals.
So in other words, if they (the pro-lifers) had no prior knowledge of said person CTB'ing or dying from CTB, they wouldn't have felt a loss. In a sense, what they (the pro-lifers) don't know, can't hurt them (the pro-lifers), because it doesn't threaten their world view and of course, their ego. They also do not care about improving the said person's (sufferer) quality of life as much as it is to just pad their egos, but that goes without saying. After all, it's often just about their (pro-lifers') ego and validating their beliefs and worldview; in other words, it's all about them (and their egos). It is the epitome of selfishness, arrogance, and cruelty.
@Forever Sleep @FuneralCry