• New TOR Mirror: suicidffbey666ur5gspccbcw2zc7yoat34wbybqa3boei6bysflbvqd.onion

  • Hey Guest,

    If you want to donate, we have a thread with updated donation options here at this link: About Donations

Pluto

Pluto

Meowing to go out
Dec 27, 2020
3,426
It has been said that historically, the most stable societies have been of the one-man-rule variety. The past few centuries have seen much experimentation, yet all seem to be converging back to that same default.

Example: Russia
1721-1917 - Russian Empire: a subjugated population ruled by the Tsar/Emperor.
1922-1991 - USSR: an even more subjugated population ruled by the leader and his State.
1991-present - Russian Federation: a subjugated population ruled by you-know-who and the oligarch/billionaire class.

Example 2: the
United Shursh
pre-1776 - British monarchy colonialism, etc.
1865 - Slavery abolished.
circa-1900 - First billionaires emerge.
post-WWII - unsustainable era of large-scale prosperity.
Present day - billionaire class owns the media and sets the public narrative, government subservient to corporate lobbyists serving the billionaire class, fast-growing disparity between billionaire class and the masses, possible billionaire-led (Trump) movement to terminate democracy outright.

In the wider scale of Egypt or China, where there have been thousands of years worth of relatively stable one-man-rule ranging from ancient dynasties to modern autocrats, the past few centuries seem a mere failed experiment in egalitarianism.