I'm not wanting to step into a subject that'll lead to the usual flamewars. Nation-states come & go; the US has only been around about 250 years. In contrast, there's much older corporations/companies
If you're 25, you've been around for 10% of US history
But lots of people who "hate" something have great ideas on improving it! Lots of fine people hate the world — as it is today. And that's fine, maybe they can help fix it, if people stopped stepping on each other's toes
With the US, well admittedly it has its fingers in lots of people's pies, and most people hate the government. So it'll cause a lot of hate until it one day fixes its problems
Is the US a 3rd world nation? Well, the usual pattern is
great misery next to great opulence:
Noam Chomsky said:
So, a typical Third World country has a small sector of the population which lives in extraordinary wealth and opulence, and they’re kind of connected with the ongoing experiments. And they’re the ones who write the articles and the books and so on, so they think it’s all great, and they advocate it and so on.
For the rest of the population, outside of that small sector — this runs across any Third World society you look at — they live somewhere between suffering and misery. You know, depends on the society. Most of them, it’s closer to misery. And as the experiments proceed, it gets closer and closer to that.
Then there’s another part of the population which is simply superfluous. I mean, they don’t contribute anything to wealth creation, and you’ve got to do something with them. Like, if it’s, say, Colombia, which gets half of U.S. military aid for the hemisphere and has the worst human rights record in the hemisphere, then what you do with them is send out the military forces or the paramilitary forces to murder them. Now they’re called disposable people. In other places, you do it in various other different ways, but somehow you just get rid of them.
So, that’s a typical Third World society: small sector of great wealth, a large mass of the population facing one or another problem, from down to misery and then disposable people.
That’s fairly uniform. And that’s been a uniform consequence of these experiments, which, in general, have been going on for hundreds of years. So, the general principle is, designers do great; the ones who cooperate with them do great; the experimental animals, only by accident do they gain anything, mostly they suffer quite a bit.
If you squint, the US is similar. And in all the stats, there's things we don't discuss. Take for example its
world-beating jailing of its own people. (Recent stats are unclear & juked;
maybe a few countries like Rwanda recently got a higher rate. China has lots of unreported prisoners, so we should double their numbers — but it has far more people, so its rate is still much lower than the US's)
I spoke with a US prison guard recently, who quit because
"I saw enough things no man should see". He told me how the prettier men would rub their own shit on themselves, to avoid being raped by
"gladiator motherfuckers". Game of Thrones
Go speak with the Uber/Lyft drivers, they have all sorts of stories of violence, misery & endless wageslavery
There's many friendly, open people in the US. Lots of nice things about it. But you walk downtown in some cities, the homeless roam like zombies. That's you, if you burn out & lose your job. It's a most unforgiving place
When I went to Manhattan, I dreamed that it could be a utopia, with its huge population density. If only people were free. I could almost hear it strain under all the bonds it wraps people in
Everyone's divided & conquered by pseudoscience like "race", culture wars, those pageants where everyone's rallied to crown social managers as lords & king...