TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,831
In this thread on Reddit, a guy was asking a legitimate question in regards to his rights should he ever be faced with a situation called involuntary commitment. He is met with skepticism, gas-lighting, guilt-tripping, and even questioning his mental state, all of which are patronizing and condescending when ALL he did was ask a legitimate question hoping to get "actual" legal answers. Mind you, this occurs a lot even on the so called subreddit called "legal advice".
Comments like these (shown below) are some of the reasons why some people don't even seek help and sometimes even CTB.
At any rate, these comments are just examples of how the pro-life bullshit society runs and even for people who are looking to find "actual" resources in order to protect themselves from harm (involuntary treatment against their will) and violation of their rights, they are being shunned, treated like a problem rather than being given actual advice and leaving it be. I thought that perhaps some people will be aware of that even for those who are 'seeking legal advice' to protect themselves from abuse of power from the institutions and people in charge are even being under attack (bullied, persecuted, and more). There really is (almost) no defense if even the constructs that are set to protect against this type(s) of abuse are moot and useless at best. Yes, reddit is a fucking joke for the most part, but that's another topic altogether.
Comments like these (shown below) are some of the reasons why some people don't even seek help and sometimes even CTB.
Not only is it condescending, it is also very presumptuous to assume and assert that the person asking the question is wrong. He also tried to dodge the question and what not by going off on a slight tangent about "involuntary commitment" and what not. Yes, legally there is a difference between a 72-hour hold vs a longer detainment (requiring an court order), but either way, it is still a gross violation of freedom and civil rights.From the user, thepatman:
By definition, involuntary commitment is done without your permission and only in situations where you object. More specifically, in situations where your ability to make good decisions for yourself is compromised.
A 72-hour hold, or whatever it ends up being in in the jurisdiction you're in, is going to be difficult to stop once it's started.
Realistically, unless you have or develop severe mental illness, involuntary holds are extremely unlikely to crop up in your life. Really, extremely unlikely. In the situations where they do, most people get treated and released very quickly. And if you're not, its likely because you need to be there.
A stupid user condoning and sanctioning this barbaric act of practice, assuming that all involuntary commitments are just and correct (which they aren't). People like him/her are the reasons why there are people who won't seek help when they otherwise may (for fear of being locked up against one's will and loss of freedom, civil rights).From the user, kiserai:
I don't know Colorado laws. In the states I've worked, an involuntary commitment required much more than a statement by a random person. It required a licensed professional (doctor, psychologist, etc) do an assessment and document the reason why a person was such a risk to himself or others that a 72-hour hold was justified. Keeping someone beyond that would require a court order.
Unless Colorado is completely off the rails, it's not done lightly.
If you meet that (high) standard, there is not much you can do to stop the doctors from treating you. This is by design and generally a good thing.
Yet another user gaslighting and even being presumptuous as to question the asker's mental health.(User unknown - was deleted)
I'm thinking you might instead want to just talk to a counselor once or twice. Some things in your post and this reply make me think you might have a slight issue with paranoia. A lot of people do and life is much more fun once you've dealt with the root causes of those feelings.
At any rate, these comments are just examples of how the pro-life bullshit society runs and even for people who are looking to find "actual" resources in order to protect themselves from harm (involuntary treatment against their will) and violation of their rights, they are being shunned, treated like a problem rather than being given actual advice and leaving it be. I thought that perhaps some people will be aware of that even for those who are 'seeking legal advice' to protect themselves from abuse of power from the institutions and people in charge are even being under attack (bullied, persecuted, and more). There really is (almost) no defense if even the constructs that are set to protect against this type(s) of abuse are moot and useless at best. Yes, reddit is a fucking joke for the most part, but that's another topic altogether.