TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,821
Disclaimer: I'm not going to make light of this tragedy nor glorify the perpetrator. The actions of said individual is reprehensible, and this thread is to show yet another perfect example of what happens in a society that doesn't have a legal right to die for it's citizens.
When I learned about this recent tragedy in the news yet again (which is something that is recurring in the US), I can't help but to think, this is yet another major reason why voluntary euthanasia and the right to die should be legalized and enshrined. Of course, many prolifers would just peddle the same bullshit platitudes, scrutinize about means access (more gun control, more red flag laws, ban assault weapons, mental health crisis, etc. Note: I'm not trying to get political here as this is an apolitical issue and both major parties have their issues too.), infringing more on civil liberties (increase in paternalism and surveillance), all in the name of safety and security. In the past, I've written similar threads about that in previous tragedies too as well as why voluntary euthanasia could be beneficial for society as well as the individual oneself.
See the news stories here:
Also here:
No surprise, just imagine if voluntary euthanasia was legalized and if that perpetrator had access to that. Instead of those people dying, then it would be a win-win situation for both parties (the innocent and unwilling victims of violence as well as the perpetrator). This is because if say, this person was going to die then they would get their wish while not harming others who wish to live. Ironically though, society has always (and still currently does) hold the view that suicide is wrong, suicide is never allowed (except for maybe terminal illness), and this is unfortunately one of the consequences of a prohibitionist society. A society that loves life and is willing to do anything and (just about) everything to prolong and preserve it regardless of the circumstances.
Cynically speaking, perhaps subconsciously prolifers never really thought that "Maybe if voluntary euthanasia was legalized and regulated, and if we stopped trying to prevent suicide at every step of the way, in every scenario (barring terminal illness), perhaps this tragedy may just never happen!" I always viewed euthanasia and suicide as an option, albeit it should be very carefully considered as there is no returning or going back from it. While I could get into more details and in-depth about the legalization of voluntary euthanasia, not just for special circumstances, but for those who would otherwise do harm to others. However, I'll post that in another thread as this thread will be mainly focused on the recent tragedy.
Anyhow, it is ironic that in the aftermath most people (prolifers of course) will claim that the perpetrator should have started with themselves and not taken innocents with them. I would concur with that, however! Suppose we rewind time and go back to the day before the tragedy, and instead of the perpetrator committing this heinous action, the perpetrator took their own life. Instead of the tragedy talking about many victims, most people would still be upset that oh said person should have sought "help" or that said person should never have taken their own life, and there would be articles about mental health, gun control, and of course, the (obtusely) obligatory three-digit hotline number being plastered everywhere in a virtuous (empty) signal.
I'm sure there are people who can relate to how I think and perceive this situation. @FuneralCry @Forever Sleep @RainAndSadness
Edit: I added an additional link to another thread I recently written.
When I learned about this recent tragedy in the news yet again (which is something that is recurring in the US), I can't help but to think, this is yet another major reason why voluntary euthanasia and the right to die should be legalized and enshrined. Of course, many prolifers would just peddle the same bullshit platitudes, scrutinize about means access (more gun control, more red flag laws, ban assault weapons, mental health crisis, etc. Note: I'm not trying to get political here as this is an apolitical issue and both major parties have their issues too.), infringing more on civil liberties (increase in paternalism and surveillance), all in the name of safety and security. In the past, I've written similar threads about that in previous tragedies too as well as why voluntary euthanasia could be beneficial for society as well as the individual oneself.
See the news stories here:
Nashville school shooter Audrey Hale’s chilling final messages to pal revealed: ‘I’m planning to die’
Nashville school shooter Audrey Hale sent her friend, Averianna Patton, a chilling “suicide note” on Instagram minutes before shooting at The Covenant School, writing: “I’m planning to die today.”…
nypost.com
Also here:
What we know about Covenant School shooting in Nashville
7 people are dead after one of the deadliest school shootings in Tennessee history. Here's what we know so far.
www.tennessean.com
No surprise, just imagine if voluntary euthanasia was legalized and if that perpetrator had access to that. Instead of those people dying, then it would be a win-win situation for both parties (the innocent and unwilling victims of violence as well as the perpetrator). This is because if say, this person was going to die then they would get their wish while not harming others who wish to live. Ironically though, society has always (and still currently does) hold the view that suicide is wrong, suicide is never allowed (except for maybe terminal illness), and this is unfortunately one of the consequences of a prohibitionist society. A society that loves life and is willing to do anything and (just about) everything to prolong and preserve it regardless of the circumstances.
Cynically speaking, perhaps subconsciously prolifers never really thought that "Maybe if voluntary euthanasia was legalized and regulated, and if we stopped trying to prevent suicide at every step of the way, in every scenario (barring terminal illness), perhaps this tragedy may just never happen!" I always viewed euthanasia and suicide as an option, albeit it should be very carefully considered as there is no returning or going back from it. While I could get into more details and in-depth about the legalization of voluntary euthanasia, not just for special circumstances, but for those who would otherwise do harm to others. However, I'll post that in another thread as this thread will be mainly focused on the recent tragedy.
Anyhow, it is ironic that in the aftermath most people (prolifers of course) will claim that the perpetrator should have started with themselves and not taken innocents with them. I would concur with that, however! Suppose we rewind time and go back to the day before the tragedy, and instead of the perpetrator committing this heinous action, the perpetrator took their own life. Instead of the tragedy talking about many victims, most people would still be upset that oh said person should have sought "help" or that said person should never have taken their own life, and there would be articles about mental health, gun control, and of course, the (obtusely) obligatory three-digit hotline number being plastered everywhere in a virtuous (empty) signal.
I'm sure there are people who can relate to how I think and perceive this situation. @FuneralCry @Forever Sleep @RainAndSadness
Edit: I added an additional link to another thread I recently written.
Last edited: