• Hey Guest,

    An update on the OFCOM situation: As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. OFCOM, the UK’s communications regulator, has singled out our community, demanding compliance with their Online Safety Act despite our minimal UK presence. This is a blatant overreach, and they have been sending letters pressuring us to comply with their censorship agenda.

    Our platform is already blocked by many UK ISPs, yet they continue their attempts to stifle free speech. Standing up to this kind of regulatory overreach requires lots of resources to maintain our infrastructure and fight back against these unjust demands. If you value our community and want to support us during this time, we would greatly appreciate any and all donations.

    Read more about the situation here: Click to View Post

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
kosameAmagai

kosameAmagai

Member
Apr 25, 2022
48
it is recommended that we use 98% sodium nitrite but why? wouldn't using a less pure one (lets say 90%) but ingesting more of it achieve the same effect ? e.g instead of using 30g of 98% sodium nitrite the person uses 33g of 90% sodium nitrite, shouldn't this work and give around the same result as using 98% SN?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Namelesa
Mäximum

Mäximum

All the effort for nothing...
Apr 5, 2023
181
The more percent the better. This is recommended, because SN is really salty so ingesting less of it and still having enough to ctb is more comfortable for the individual taking it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kosameAmagai
J

J&L383

Paragon
Jul 18, 2023
947
I would agree, the more pure, the less you have to take. But perhaps more importantly what component is the non-sodium nitrite, because if that 10% component is something that counters the effects of sodium nitrite, then that could make it even less effective? But if you can know for certain that it's just a filler, with no biological action, then you should be fine with the lower concentration. (Just taking more)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rymrgand and kosameAmagai
Rymrgand

Rymrgand

From now on, there will be no more darkness
Jan 5, 2025
238
I'm not an expert in the SN protocol, but I assume they are right about it. There are some disadvantages to low purity SN, as I see it:

1. It's harder to prepare the dose if you don't use pure SN. You would need to make sure you know what the exact purity is and you would need to calculate how much you need to use. If it's (almost) pure, it's more straightforward, you can simply follow the protocol.

2. What's the other component? If it's toxic, it could make you suffer a lot. Or maybe it could make you vomit. Or it would affect your body in a way that it would "save" you, or would make our death slower. Or maybe it is dangerous, or it's corrosive if you drink it, or it simply tastes way worse. It's not desirable to drink unknown chemical products, even if you are supposed to be dead soon.

3. Even if the other component is harmless, you still need to drink it. If you use low purity SN, you would need to drink more water or drink a more concetrated dose. That means you are more likely to vomit, or to be unable to drink it, or it could affect the way your stomach absorbs the SN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kosameAmagai

Similar threads

T
Replies
4
Views
683
Suicide Discussion
TurboCharcha
T
SchrodingerIsDed
Replies
9
Views
696
Suicide Discussion
locked*n*loaded
locked*n*loaded
I
Replies
0
Views
597
Suicide Discussion
idelttoilfsadness21
I
ForeverCaHa
Replies
0
Views
159
Suicide Discussion
ForeverCaHa
ForeverCaHa
SophieMakesGames
Venting True Evil
Replies
2
Views
237
Suicide Discussion
Forever Sleep
F