• ⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block.

N

noname223

Archangel
Aug 18, 2020
6,439
I know this question sounds naive.
They are pedophiles and that's it. I think the biggest stigmatization of them is actually the right option. But applied to the Epstein clients this sadly won't happen.

The age of the victims ranged from 11 to 17 in most cases. I am fine with calling them pedophiles. But isn't the interest in teenager around the age 11-14 called hebephilia and the age between 15-19 ephebophilia? I had to look it up but I saw commentators mentioning that. Some of them use this as an excuse. I could imagine fucking Michael Tracy saying that. His takes on Epstein are disgusting.

I am asking this question because I wonder what the interest of these elite pedophiles were. You also see that philantropists who want to be seen as altruistic were part of it. Maybe many of them are narcisstists who do it for their ego. Maybe they enjoy to excert power over others. And excerting it over underaged women is the goldstandard for these assholes. I wonder whether they actively want to destroy lives or whether that's just the byproduct. I wonder whether they enjoy to hurt vulnerable people. Or whether it is actually their sexual preference. Or they do it because its the ultimate taboo. Or maybe a mix of all of these explanations.

What do you think?
 
zdeweilx

zdeweilx

It's over
Dec 15, 2025
100
I remember reading somewhere that "powerful" people feel the most powerful when they find themselves freely doing the most immoral things on earth. Apparently, the fact they are free to do whatever the fuck they want at any moment kind of fuels their egotrips.
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
4
Views
529
Offtopic
lionetta12
L
F
Replies
22
Views
863
Offtopic
miles-away
miles-away
F
Replies
22
Views
1K
Offtopic
anonymousperson
A