By anti-choice people you mean people who oppose the choice to die, oppose the choice to live, or both of these groups? Not that my answer would be different for any option. (Personal interest.)
I think that my wish is not realistic, but I wish that people would, instead of saying "you shouldn't suicide/live", say "I don't want you to suicide/live."
But this changes things
a lot.
First, it draws the attention to the
challenger (C). If C doesn''t want me to suicide/live, why C is concerned? What are
his/her motives? It was already established that the C
is a concerned party, otherwise C wouldn't challenge my stance, my choice. (I want to suicide/live.)
Second, which really is the continuation of the first thing, the interest of C is a requirement for C to challenge me, while my interest is not a requirement for C to challenge me. From this follows that that C is
always pursuing
his/her interest, while it is not clear whether C pursues
my interest. This again gives rise to questions. If I don't know their interests, how do I know that our interests are compatible, and not in conflict? Considering that C is pursuing personal interest, wouldn't C be incentivized to convince me that we share compatible interests?
There might be more questions I'm not aware of as of now. Buuut you probably get the idea. Whoever reading all of this.
Feel free to challenge my stance