T
tuto170
Student
- Jul 1, 2019
- 114
As I said in another train thread, if traumatizing the conductor is an issue, remember to make sure that conductor for the train you decide to use is someone who you know deserves to be traumatized, or someone who wouldn't get traumatized.Saying the passengers of the train will get traumatized is a bit too much. At max they will be shocked, but it will pass as they go on with their lives, since they weren't controlling the train. Now, the conductor is the real victim here, since they would, in theory, have the duty of stopping the train before it hits you, and failing to do so will put the burden of having killed somebody on their shoulders. So it doesn't matter, in my opinion. You will traumatize the conductor in both cases. You may make the passengers late to their appointments though, so maybe a cargo would affect less people. Sorry, I do not know which position to lay on the track. But here in my town at least, where there are only cargo trains, they go slower inside the urban area, so it'd be more effective if you tried this outskirts.
How am i supposed to know that? Am i gonna call railway company and ask if the conductor coming in an hour to my town is an asshole cause i wanna traumatize him? I dont care what happens when i die, i wont even leave a goodbye letter.As I said in another train thread, if traumatizing the conductor is an issue, remember to make sure that conductor for the train you decide to use is someone who you know deserves to be traumatized, or someone who wouldn't get traumatized.
I was half joking but really, if you don't care then you don't care. I meant that only for people who do care.How am i supposed to know that? Am i gonna call railway company and ask if the conductor coming in an hour to my town is an asshole cause i wanna traumatize him? I dont care what happens when i die, i wont even leave a goodbye letter.
Wouldn't you think it's fail safe if you lay your neck on the track though?You should definitely choose a cargo train, not only because of moral reasons. Cargo trains are usually much heavier than passenger ones and due to conservation of momentum, a bigger force will act upon your body. That means it's more likely you'll ctb. It's also important that the train should have high velocity so you have to do it outside the city.
I don't wanna pretend to be smart but I'll tell you why I would never jump under a train. Well, some locomotives has a structural element called 'the box'. I dunno if it's a proper english term, it comes from polish slang. Anyway, this element has a small entrance in front of a chassis of locomotive. I've heard stories when train drivers claimed to hear suicidal people bumped into that thing. They were massacred about an hour before they died. 'The box' is a small place filled with slow-moving mechanical devices.
However, I don't know if it applies to all the locomotives around the world. I'm sure 'boxes' are common along locomotives in post-communist countires
i was told train conductors are specifically taught and warned about the fact that in their careers they are prone to eventually seeing animals or humans get hit by their trains and im sure it will still shock them, but they know what they signed up for.
Well, it's complicated. As far as I know putting your head on the rail is discouraged because it's hard to predict how the force will apportion upon your body. It depends on the locomotive's chassis construction, your position, speed and other factors. Some people claim it's a good way to catch the bus via a train, however I couldn't find any discussion. In my opinion the force might break your neck or even rip off your head but it can also damage you immortally. It's safer to jump on the front of train so physically your body will act like during a fall from a very great height (above 200 m).Wouldn't you think it's fail safe if you lay your neck on the track though?
I don't know. I'm not saying it goes perfect 100% of the time. I've seen videos and it went just fine. I was so glad about this.Well, it's complicated. As far as I know putting your head on the rail is discouraged because it's hard to predict how the force will apportion upon your body. It depends on the locomotive's chassis construction, your position, speed and other factors. Some people claim it's a good way to catch the bus via a train, however I couldn't find any discussion. In my opinion the force might break your neck or even rip off your head but it can also damage you immortally. It's safer to jump on the front of train so physically your body will act like during a fall from a very great height (above 200 m).
As a train crash survivor that crashed due to someone committing suicide on the tracks, I can tell you, its traumatising. 6 people died and countless more were injured in my crash. I've never been so scared in my life and it took years for me to be able to even go to a train station. Please don't make assumptions people will just get on with their lives after an incident like this. The driver certainly won't. I couldn't be more against a method if I tried to be honest.Saying the passengers of the train will get traumatized is a bit too much. At max they will be shocked, but it will pass as they go on with their lives, since they weren't controlling the train. Now, the conductor is the real victim here, since they would, in theory, have the duty of stopping the train before it hits you, and failing to do so will put the burden of having killed somebody on their shoulders. So it doesn't matter, in my opinion. You will traumatize the conductor in both cases. You may make the passengers late to their appointments though, so maybe a cargo would affect less people.
The trauma came from the crash, not from someone attempting suicide on the tracks. Had the train just hit the person and remained intact, without any passengers getting hurt, I assure you the psychological consequences would've been much more bland. About the driver, I made it very clear in the same post you quoted that they would be the ones to get traumatized for sure. I just couldn't imagine a single person could be enough to cause such a huge machine like a train to crash, now I am much more against this method than I was before.As a train crash survivor that crashed due to someone committing suicide on the tracks, I can tell you, its traumatising. 6 people died and countless more were injured in my crash. I've never been so scared in my life and it took years for me to be able to even go to a train station. Please don't make assumptions people will just get on with their lives after an incident like this. The driver certainly won't. I couldn't be more against a method if I tried to be honest.