Infinite Solipsist
Member
- Jun 20, 2024
- 89
I'm not sure if this is an accurate method of illustrating the angle needed but I wanted to see what you guys think. The commonly accepted route is a 45° angle through the mouth but I'm starting to question this wisdom. Sorry in advance if the full image is gigantic.
-45° is shown in orange with the lips being the center point for the crown of the gun.
-51° is shown in red. I think this may be a more optimal angle compared to 45°. (Lips are still the center point)
-Lastly, this one is my idea. 30° from behind the head with the center point being at the same height as the lips. This trajectory looks like it will follow the near-entirety of the brainstem and the gases should destroy large portions of the cerebellum as well.
(Assume midline of the skull for all 3 angles)
These angles can be precisely measured by sticking a magnetic digital level under the barrel of your gun. I guess I'll need to build a rig to hold the gun at the correct angle if I'm going to put it behind my head. Is this the proper way to visualize angles in a 2D image?
-45° is shown in orange with the lips being the center point for the crown of the gun.
-51° is shown in red. I think this may be a more optimal angle compared to 45°. (Lips are still the center point)
-Lastly, this one is my idea. 30° from behind the head with the center point being at the same height as the lips. This trajectory looks like it will follow the near-entirety of the brainstem and the gases should destroy large portions of the cerebellum as well.
(Assume midline of the skull for all 3 angles)
These angles can be precisely measured by sticking a magnetic digital level under the barrel of your gun. I guess I'll need to build a rig to hold the gun at the correct angle if I'm going to put it behind my head. Is this the proper way to visualize angles in a 2D image?