Method What’s a method that even if fail it won’t ruin your life

[foreverotting]

Basically the title. What's a method I can use that if I fail it there will be no drawbacks to it. I know that every method has some of course but I don't want to be paralyzed or have some organ not function properly for the rest of my life.

 

[LifeIsAChore11]

The exit bag method. Theoretically, you can get brain damage from failing the inert gas headbag method. But from acccounts of failures I heard on here people just woke up with a headache and nausea.

 

[Rabitfever]

I don't think that's entirely true is it? I'm sure there will be some lasting damage? I don't know

 

[doesntevenmatter]

I hate to say it but I just don't think there is anything that 100% would not give you complications moving forward. All of them have risks. There might be some that have less risks, but there's always going to be that chance. Personally I would say the least risky would be N or SN, but even with them you could probably be braindead if things go a certain way. Those are also two of the most efficient ways to CTB, not coincidentally. In my opinion, chances are they'll either get the job done or you'll be saved in time and they'll reverse it. I'd focus on limiting the chances of intervention to as close to zero as you can, because that gives you the best chance of not only succeeding but then obviously not having to deal with repercussions of surviving.

 

[Anonymous_A]

Could jump into lava.

 

[Cant go back]

I'd say a shotgun or handgun through the mouth (aiming at minimum at a 45 degree angle) in a remote area. Even if the person messes it up the blood loss will eventually kill them.
This is one of my chosen methods for that very reason!

 

[Hyacinthoides]

I have been thinking VSED (no food or drink for as long as it takes - usually about a week). From what I have read it is mostly used by much older people (I am 24) dealing with chronical pain or illness. But it has so many advantages. You are completely in control. You can turn back at any point with no side effects. If you do go ahead with it, it is because you are very sure of and happy with your decision. Also, not many people know about it, so if you get found out it can pass for something less serious than a suicide attempt (stress, even an eating disorder).

However, no one here seems to see it as an option. So there may be issues I have not considered! One obvious disadvantage is that you need some time - so it is only really practical if you live on your own. (Although I think that for the first couple of days you can carry out a more or less normal life, like going to work.)

I would be very interested in what other people think!

 

[anothernameless]

What about N?

 

[again_noidea]

I have been thinking VSED (no food or drink for as long as it takes - usually about a week). From what I have read it is mostly used by much older people (I am 24) dealing with chronical pain or illness. But it has so many advantages. You are completely in control. You can turn back at any point with no side effects. If you do go ahead with it, it is because you are very sure of and happy with your decision. Also, not many people know about it, so if you get found out it can pass for something less serious than a suicide attempt (stress, even an eating disorder).

However, no one here seems to see it as an option. So there may be issues I have not considered! One obvious disadvantage is that you need some time - so it is only really practical if you live on your own. (Although I think that for the first couple of days you can carry out a more or less normal life, like going to work.)

I would be very interested in what other people think!oi

Yesterday, before falling asleep, i thought about that. it is a beautiful and difficult way to go.

 

[Wakawaka]

I didn't take enough to ctb but enough to black out, woke up, threw up, took a nap and was feeling fine after that

 

[archipelago]

I didn't take enough to ctb but enough to black out, woke up, threw up, took a nap and was feeling fine after that

Do you know roughly how much you used?

 

[PrincessInWhite]

It doesn't usually cause brain damage but failing an SN attempt is pretty much Guaranteed cancer down the line. It's a carcinogen in much smaller quantities. There is no risk proof method unfortunately

 

[Onkyo74893]

Jumping from a high place, say 100 feet or more, onto asphalt, concrete, or rock boulders seems to me like a foolproof method.

 

[PeacefulTonic]

What about N?

Its neuro protective properties makes it the best method imo. Failure won't cause any brain damage

 

[gr1lledcheese]

I've often thought about, how to put this? Train. Just go out there and wait for one. Don't know if I have the nerve though.

 

[looseye]

Jumping from a high place, say 100 feet or more, onto asphalt, concrete, or rock boulders seems to me like a foolproof method.

Catch is that you need fourteen men worth of balls to pull that off

 

[Onkyo74893]

True looseye. But then lots of people around the world have used that method. Or high bridge jumpers, onto water. The golden gate bridge in San Francisco is a magnet for suicides. Hitting water from that height is almost like hitting concrete. I guess there's a lot of ballsy suicides!

 

[Someone123]

I'd say a shotgun or handgun through the mouth (aiming at minimum at a 45 degree angle) in a remote area. Even if the person messes it up the blood loss will eventually kill them.
This is one of my chosen methods for that very reason!

See a recent post whuch has photos of faailed shotgun suicides- there is no doubt that a failed shotgun suicide case by far the most damage and the worst uality of life of any method that fails, and any failed gun attempt is likely to leave very severe damage- many survivors of failed gun suicide attempts have posted videos on youtube showing their faces mostly blown off- a gun suicide attempt has the exact opposite result of what is being asked abou in this threadm honestly- doind more research on this could really help you, you may settle on a method with less downside risk.
In my opinion both sn and full suspension fall in this category, with sn being probably better- of course if you are rescued just before you are about to die you can have brain damage with any method, but I haven't heard of this actaully happening with sn and I think it is very rare with full suspension. This is just one person';s impression based on very incomplete knowledge, so this is not authoritative, it is just an educated guess.

 

[Onkyo74893]

GrilledCheese, people who stand in front of an approaching train often give the operator of the train PTSD for life. The same could go for someone who dashes in front of a truck. If you go with the train method, throw yourself under one of the freight train cars as it passes, so nobody has to see the impact.

 

[Someone123]

GrilledCheese, people who stand in front of an approaching train often give the operator of the train PTSD for life. The same could go for someone who dashes in front of a truck. If you go with the train method, throw yourself under one of the freight train cars as it passes, so nobody has to see the impact.

I don't knwo if that would work to try to time that to go under one of the freight carsas it passes, I am pretty sure the train goes way too fast compared to a person's top speed for this to work- it's an interesting idea, but I doubt if it would work. The biggest risk with a train attempt is the 1 in 3 chance of survival, often with amputated limbs, brain damage, etc- a train is one of the worst methods to survive and a 1 in 3 chance of survival, which is a creedible estimate based on a precvioius post from a former train driver, is way too high of a risk for such horrible reslts. Even of the people who die records show they may spend up to four days in the hospityal in extreme agony before they die- the downside risk is way too high for me iwth this method.

 

[Onkyo74893]

I don't knwo if that would work to try to time that to go under one of the freight carsas it passes, I am pretty sure the train goes way too fast compared to a person's top speed for this to work- it's an interesting idea, but I doubt if it would work. The biggest risk with a train attempt is the 1 in 3 chance of survival, often with amputated limbs, brain damage, etc- a train is one of the worst methods to survive and a 1 in 3 chance of survival, which is a creedible estimate based on a precvioius post from a former train driver, is way too high of a risk for such horrible reslts. Even of the people who die records show they may spend up to four days in the hospityal in extreme agony before they die- the downside risk is way too high for me iwth this method.

I should have clarified. Don't throw yourself under a freight train that's hauling ass. Do it under one that's going just slow enough that you have time to lay your midsection right across the track. Foolproof.