sinister
my guilt won't purify me
- Nov 5, 2023
- 2
See, the problem lies within the question itself. To ask what separates man from monster assumes they are distinct. But are they? The line blurs when humanity's darkest truths reveal that the monster is merely a reflection of man. The cruelty, the fear, the hunger for dominance are these not human traits? Perhaps the question is not what separates them but why we cling to the illusion that separation exists at all.
Look at history, at the wars fought in the name of power, belief, or revenge. Is the massacre of the innocent not monstrous? Is the exploitation of the weak not akin to a predator stalking its prey? Humanity's capacity for violence often surpasses that of any beast, for unlike the beast, man kills not just to survive but to fulfil desires greed, hatred, even the hollow satisfaction of proving superiority.
Consider the way humans destroy not only others but themselves. They poison their minds with envy and their bodies with indulgence. They dismantle their environment, carving mountains and seas to satiate fleeting comforts. Monsters consume; humans devour. The difference is that humans can mask their hunger with words like 'progress' or 'justice.' But underneath lies the same primal instinct: survival at any cost.
Even love, the one virtue humanity clings to as proof of their goodness, carries shadows. Obsession, control, jealousy, love too easily turns into possession. Monsters may claim territory; humans claim hearts, bending others to their will under the guise of affection. What is this if not monstrous in its core?
So, when you ask what separates man from monster, understand that the answer lies in this truth: there is no separation. Humans are monsters, thinking, feeling, dreaming creatures who can rationalize their every cruelty. The question you should ask instead is this, why do we fear the monster in the dark, but not the one in the mirror?
Look at history, at the wars fought in the name of power, belief, or revenge. Is the massacre of the innocent not monstrous? Is the exploitation of the weak not akin to a predator stalking its prey? Humanity's capacity for violence often surpasses that of any beast, for unlike the beast, man kills not just to survive but to fulfil desires greed, hatred, even the hollow satisfaction of proving superiority.
Consider the way humans destroy not only others but themselves. They poison their minds with envy and their bodies with indulgence. They dismantle their environment, carving mountains and seas to satiate fleeting comforts. Monsters consume; humans devour. The difference is that humans can mask their hunger with words like 'progress' or 'justice.' But underneath lies the same primal instinct: survival at any cost.
Even love, the one virtue humanity clings to as proof of their goodness, carries shadows. Obsession, control, jealousy, love too easily turns into possession. Monsters may claim territory; humans claim hearts, bending others to their will under the guise of affection. What is this if not monstrous in its core?
So, when you ask what separates man from monster, understand that the answer lies in this truth: there is no separation. Humans are monsters, thinking, feeling, dreaming creatures who can rationalize their every cruelty. The question you should ask instead is this, why do we fear the monster in the dark, but not the one in the mirror?