![eryu](/data/avatars/l/31/31233.jpg?1636274050)
eryu
Member
- Sep 25, 2021
- 90
From wikipedia:
I couldn't find anything about this.
I'm also wondering where I should try to land. The options seem to be:
- the river
- the ground just next to that
- the expressway (attempting to avoid traffic)
River -
I'm not sure if it would be frozen over and how thick the ice would be. If there is ice and it doesn't break then isn't that about as good as concrete? Some have said the surface of water is like hitting concrete but usually they're talking about higher drops. I'm not sure it is true for only 45 meters up.
If it's not frozen over or if I go through the ice then I'd hopefully just freeze or drown if the fall wasn't enough. Awful, I know. But at least it would be over.
This seems like the best option since I would likely drown if I wasn't killed by the impact.
Ground -
The photo I posted below is from when it was first built. I think there is brush around this area now but I should be able to spot areas that aren't obstructed. If the snow wasn't too deep to cushion the fall, would this be a good option?
Expressway -
It's elevated a bit (there are a couple and I'd be looking at the lower one) but concrete is supposed to be a better bet.
here someone says they witnessed a jumper basically burst upon impact:
https://web.archive.org/web/2022012...com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=328247&start=0
I was thinking if I chose this then I could aim for the edge and that if I did it late at night there wouldn't be much traffic so no one would be distracted (potentially causing danger) by the sight of me falling. I know people would see my body later but I figure that's less alarming than someone falling and worrying about where they might land.
Even if I ended up in a lane, there'd be low chance of it causing any serious mishaps if traffic wasn't heavy.
Is this realistic?
I already know there is a risk of surviving jumps and that the height isn't the best.
SN isn't an option for me and I have a lot of trouble thinking through other methods.
Photo clearly showing the bridge (though many decades ago without all the brush):
- Height: 45.4 metres or 143.8 feet (12½ storeys)
I couldn't find anything about this.
I'm also wondering where I should try to land. The options seem to be:
- the river
- the ground just next to that
- the expressway (attempting to avoid traffic)
River -
I'm not sure if it would be frozen over and how thick the ice would be. If there is ice and it doesn't break then isn't that about as good as concrete? Some have said the surface of water is like hitting concrete but usually they're talking about higher drops. I'm not sure it is true for only 45 meters up.
If it's not frozen over or if I go through the ice then I'd hopefully just freeze or drown if the fall wasn't enough. Awful, I know. But at least it would be over.
This seems like the best option since I would likely drown if I wasn't killed by the impact.
Ground -
The photo I posted below is from when it was first built. I think there is brush around this area now but I should be able to spot areas that aren't obstructed. If the snow wasn't too deep to cushion the fall, would this be a good option?
Expressway -
It's elevated a bit (there are a couple and I'd be looking at the lower one) but concrete is supposed to be a better bet.
here someone says they witnessed a jumper basically burst upon impact:
https://web.archive.org/web/2022012...com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=328247&start=0
I was thinking if I chose this then I could aim for the edge and that if I did it late at night there wouldn't be much traffic so no one would be distracted (potentially causing danger) by the sight of me falling. I know people would see my body later but I figure that's less alarming than someone falling and worrying about where they might land.
Even if I ended up in a lane, there'd be low chance of it causing any serious mishaps if traffic wasn't heavy.
Is this realistic?
I already know there is a risk of surviving jumps and that the height isn't the best.
SN isn't an option for me and I have a lot of trouble thinking through other methods.
Photo clearly showing the bridge (though many decades ago without all the brush):
Attachments
Last edited: