
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,265
I've written an article before titled "The Inevitability of Breadcrumbs… (pertaining to CTB)", which was about how people would not (even if they wanted to) open up or reveal their intention to CTB due to the risks and consequences of doing so prior to the (presumably successful) attempt. Therefore, the survivors would often find out after the fact, or otherwise the aftermath of one's CTB and being 'surprised'. This is due to society's attitude towards CTB and the ever growing paternalistic and tyrannical State (the government) when it comes to preventing CTB at all costs.
However, in this thread, I've just found two good posts (which I've put into the boxes in italics and bold) on the suicidebereavement subreddit that further reinforce my points.
The first quote in the thread, by an unknown or deleted user:
Second quote by the user, ScorpionT16:
With those quotes in mind, I would state that from my previous thread about the inevitable breadcrumbs that someone who is determined and serious to CTB, they wouldn't ever open up and thus, for the people who experience the loss, it would inevitably be a 'surprise' and there would be breadcrumbs due to the fact that one simply cannot open up about their (true) intentions without risk of intervention, possibly exacerbating their existing predicament. So as long as society and the State continues to have the anti-CTB stance, CTB prevention at all costs, including tyrannical and paternalistic means of temporary deprivation of one's freedom under the guise of help and insiduous benevolence, then there will always be people who end up following through (some successfully) and the bereaved (survivors of those who known someone who has CTB'd) will be left to pick up the pieces. Finally, I do want to say that for those who ended up being bereaved, yes their pain is valid as well and I don't want to discount that, but also society collectively needs to change their attitude on the right to die and CTB if they wish to reduce the amount of potential CTBs in general.
However, in this thread, I've just found two good posts (which I've put into the boxes in italics and bold) on the suicidebereavement subreddit that further reinforce my points.
The first quote in the thread, by an unknown or deleted user:
Of those who survive, they're going to be more likely to say they're glad that they didn't succeed, for a variety of reasons, cognitive dissonance being one. Then there's conditioning; these people know that if they don't provide the "right" response when asked, their freedom will be limited. There's social pressure; not wanting to make someone feel bad. Even if someone has legitimate reasons for why they would be better off dead, and they're willing to talk about it, the anti-suicide folks are going to try to censor them and shut them down. Including on reddit. |
Second quote by the user, ScorpionT16:
Often people don't seek help from others or speak out because the advice is the same old given over and over. Things like it will pass, stay strong, we're here for you, don't worry, etc... They often feel life isn't in their hands and that brings forth spiraling thoughts. The one thing at that moment they feel is in their control, is whether to live or not. And if help is seeked, people will rightfully say not to end their life, which further makes them feel less In control of their life. |
With those quotes in mind, I would state that from my previous thread about the inevitable breadcrumbs that someone who is determined and serious to CTB, they wouldn't ever open up and thus, for the people who experience the loss, it would inevitably be a 'surprise' and there would be breadcrumbs due to the fact that one simply cannot open up about their (true) intentions without risk of intervention, possibly exacerbating their existing predicament. So as long as society and the State continues to have the anti-CTB stance, CTB prevention at all costs, including tyrannical and paternalistic means of temporary deprivation of one's freedom under the guise of help and insiduous benevolence, then there will always be people who end up following through (some successfully) and the bereaved (survivors of those who known someone who has CTB'd) will be left to pick up the pieces. Finally, I do want to say that for those who ended up being bereaved, yes their pain is valid as well and I don't want to discount that, but also society collectively needs to change their attitude on the right to die and CTB if they wish to reduce the amount of potential CTBs in general.