KindaAlwaysKnew
Member
- Sep 26, 2018
- 14
I know it's got a very low success rate, but compared to the alternatives it still feels more appealing. You'd know what you were in for a lot more than taking an overdose, the way your body could react to an overdose is so unpredictable. But if you slit your wrists you already know it's going to hurt your arms and you'll have to deal with pain in that area. But then surely if you could endure that, and as long as the blood kept flowing, you'd eventually just become faint and lose consciousness? Sounds more peaceful than possible projectile vomiting/extreme stomach pain/seizures/cardiac events that might be brought on by overdose.
I guess the main problem would be keeping the blood flowing enough to lose a sufficient amount, which after you lose consciousness would become impossible. I guess while still conscious you could prevent the wound from clotting at the site by disturbing it.
Just trying to explain why i'm drawn to this more unpopular method. What do you guys think about it?
I guess the main problem would be keeping the blood flowing enough to lose a sufficient amount, which after you lose consciousness would become impossible. I guess while still conscious you could prevent the wound from clotting at the site by disturbing it.
Just trying to explain why i'm drawn to this more unpopular method. What do you guys think about it?