E
elizabethisworthless
Student
- May 27, 2020
- 125
Might try to starve myself I wonder if that will be the best way to go
I have been fourteen full days without food before (still drinking liquids).
I wouldn't say it's a good method
I wouldn't say it's the best way to go. If you drink but don't eat it could take months and it's likely you'll start eating again before you ctb. If you stop eating and drinking it can take 5 to 10 days but it won't be easy and it could be painful and uncomfortable at times. You would need a lot of willpower and make sure no-one intervenes.Might try to starve myself I wonder if that will be the best way to go
It's not as easy as it sounds. It's slow and painful. And interventions will more than likely be done before ctb is achieved.
It depends what country you're in. They can't in the US, for example, it's considered a violation of individual liberty.Are they really legally allowed to force feed somebody who's deliberately starving?
It does work, but it's slow and painful.Probably won't work ngl
Yes they are and will if you're found.Are they really legally allowed to force feed somebody who's deliberately starving?
Yes, it's kinda messed up, but they can either consider it mental illness driven (such as anorexia for example) and force nasal gastric tube you, or provide the needed nourishment through parenteral nutrition or Total parenteral Nutrition intravenously. They can also do whatever is needed to sustain life once you're unconscious, which then will likely end with the things options they have to "feed" you.Are they really legally allowed to force feed somebody who's deliberately starving?
Are they really legally allowed to force feed somebody who's deliberately starving?
Where are you getting your information? There are many ways they can force feed in the United States against someone's will. I agree they should just stop, especially if it's someone's desire to die, but unless on active hospice/ palliative care with those advanced directives in place, it's very possible to be forced.It depends what country you're in. They can't in the US, for example, it's considered a violation of individual liberty.
In any case, if someone refuses to eat and the system force feeds them, but the person continues to not eat of their own accord, would they just keep force feeding them for months, years even? How long can that situation last? Surely there comes a time when you just have to let a person die of malnutrition if that is their desire?
How long can such a situation last? If the person simply refuses to eat of their own accord, will the system just plug you into a nutrition drip indefinitely? Surely that is not feasible or realistic.Yes, it's kinda messed up, but they can either consider it mental illness driven (such as anorexia for example) and force nasal gastric tube you, or provide the needed nourishment through parenteral nutrition or Total parenteral Nutrition intravenously. They can also do whatever is needed to sustain life once you're unconscious, which then will likely end with the things options they have to "feed" you.
It can be for years, as awful as that sounds. Whether they decide to eat, recover, or what have you. It really depends on the situation on why they're doing it in the first place.How long can such a situation last? If the person simply refuses to eat of their own accord, will the system just plug you into a nutrition drip indefinitely? Surely that is not feasible or realistic.
I was only talking about those considered rational or mentally capable to make informed decisions. But then, who gets to decide who is rational or mentally capable?--the psychiatric system. So maybe I was too hasty in talking about individual liberty in the abstract. I think the US supreme court has affirmed the right to vsed, but this could only apply to specific settings.Where are you getting your information? There are many ways they can force feed in the United States against someone's will. I agree they should just stop, especially if it's someone's desire to die, but unless on active hospice/ palliative care with those advanced directives in place, it's very possible to be forced.
Huge double standards, because unless you're terminal or legally able to ctb, good luck with achieving it without medical intervention stepping in.It seems no one can force you to eat and surrigate your decision making process. Starvation has been used for ages to protest for political rights.
So far, judjes ruled for a full respect of someone's will just in case of sever diseases (like Alzheimer, coma).
Another case of double standards in our society...
Funnily enough, I wasn't actually trying to CTB at the time. I was just heartbroken and depressed and not eating.You have to stop drinking liquids for it to work more quickly. You probably wouldn't have survived 2 full weeks without liquids.
I was only talking about those considered rational or mentally capable to make informed decisions. But then, who gets to decide who is rational or mentally capable?--the psychiatric system. So maybe I was too hasty in talking about individual liberty in the abstract. I think the US supreme court has affirmed the right to vsed, but this could only apply to specific settings.