It's definitely the answer from my heart. Your exhortations read like clickbait, which is always a mindfuck. There is nothing linear in what I read, just going in circles, leading to nowhere clear or defined. There are logos, ethos, and pathos to consider, and I'm not finding logos, just advising to look up someone who ostensibly makes or supports your claims, nor ethos, just appeal to pathos. When I said "I'm sorry," it's because I was addressing the pathos, which can feel wounded. The logos wouldn't care. The ethos is unclear because you yourself do not walk this talk and haven't laid out clearly how it is an ethos.
As I alluded to above, I admit that for myself, some of my focus is on you as the messenger. If someone advises something but does not do it themselves to provide an example of how it's applicable, then why follow? A text reflects not only the words but the one who speaks them, they are inseparable. If there is nothing in it for you at all, why make the exhortation at all? Wouldn't there at least be something in it for you if it felt good to you to offer solutions to others' problems, and therfore motivate making the suggestion? I don't believe there is such a thing as pure altruism, it has to have a motivation that feels positive for the actor, such as following an ethic or soothing one's own feelings when seeing another in distress by offering a solution or a salve to that distress. If you haven't had sex in years, calling yourself hornyaboutdeath is also confusing, which relates to the clickbait-mindfuck feel of the OP and subsequent comments. My heart as well as my intellect get defensive about that.