sems
New Member
- Dec 30, 2025
- 2
As a society, we love to venerate expressions of bodily autonomy. Tattoos, cosmetic procedures, reproductive rights, even stuff like fitness and boydbuilding. We act like bodily autonmy is this inalieable right that we should seek to maintain in all contexts. But then when someone self harms, suddenly bodily autonomy becomes pathology, suddenly bodily autonomy isn't important anymore and that person should be prevented from doing what they want, to their body, in a way that doesn't affect anyone else.
You either have full bodily autonomy or no bodily autonomy. Being allowed to scar your body with tattoos or mark it during BDSM but not being allowed to do the same things in a self harm context is pure philosophical chauvanism and I hate it. For many people, self harm is a safe, non escalatory, long-term regulatory practice. But studies into it are all pre-selected for distress and depression, so obviously the data reflects that. It just sucks.
You either have full bodily autonomy or no bodily autonomy. Being allowed to scar your body with tattoos or mark it during BDSM but not being allowed to do the same things in a self harm context is pure philosophical chauvanism and I hate it. For many people, self harm is a safe, non escalatory, long-term regulatory practice. But studies into it are all pre-selected for distress and depression, so obviously the data reflects that. It just sucks.