Sprite_Geist
NULL
- May 27, 2020
- 1,586
You may often hear the phrases: "You must 'respect' the dead", "Do not speak ill of the deceased" or similar expressions along that line - so to speak. I thought about this recently (maybe too much) and I do not understand it. I might have misinterpreted this attitude the wrong way, but personally it comes across as to mean that dead people are more important and/or deserve more "respect" than those who are living.
So it is okay to mistreat another person - to abuse and insult them while they are alive. Though once they die, suddenly, being mean-spirited toward that person is no longer acceptable. Even those that bullied or disliked you will become overly-protective of your memory as if they cared about you to start with. Why do we draw the line at death - should it not be okay to mistreat another person (for no reason) at all whether or not they are gone?
If anything it should be the other way around: you should not speak ill of the living; given that someone who is alive actually has a conscience that is capable of processing emotions, and a body that can feel pain; they are much more susceptible to the ill-treatment from others. If it is not considered good to abuse the memory of a deceased individual then it should not be considered good to abuse that same person when they are alive. On the other hand (but by the same logic): if it is okay to criticise a living person for doing something wrong then it should also be okay to criticise the deceased for any wrong doings they committed in life. Death should not always equal vindication - depending on the situation.
Also: considering that some individuals who commit suicide do so because of bullying it makes sense to be kind to one another in the present. If we "respected" each other now, while we are all living, then we might not have a need to "respect" the dead, because there would not be as many people in early graves - due to suffering caused by others - in the first place.
So it is okay to mistreat another person - to abuse and insult them while they are alive. Though once they die, suddenly, being mean-spirited toward that person is no longer acceptable. Even those that bullied or disliked you will become overly-protective of your memory as if they cared about you to start with. Why do we draw the line at death - should it not be okay to mistreat another person (for no reason) at all whether or not they are gone?
If anything it should be the other way around: you should not speak ill of the living; given that someone who is alive actually has a conscience that is capable of processing emotions, and a body that can feel pain; they are much more susceptible to the ill-treatment from others. If it is not considered good to abuse the memory of a deceased individual then it should not be considered good to abuse that same person when they are alive. On the other hand (but by the same logic): if it is okay to criticise a living person for doing something wrong then it should also be okay to criticise the deceased for any wrong doings they committed in life. Death should not always equal vindication - depending on the situation.
Also: considering that some individuals who commit suicide do so because of bullying it makes sense to be kind to one another in the present. If we "respected" each other now, while we are all living, then we might not have a need to "respect" the dead, because there would not be as many people in early graves - due to suffering caused by others - in the first place.
Last edited: