TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,831
This may be an old news story, but I think there are some really good comments the TTG thread about the right to die as in this case, this is actually someone who is chronically physically ill, but prolifers continue to push their agenda and views by allowing this man to suffer indefinitely. I do not know what happened to him or if he is still alive to this day (in late 2020), but I hope his suffering ends soon.
Nevertheless, there are some really good replies and comments by posters in that subreddit.
u/profoundexperience says:
u/6138 makes an important logical point:
u/CTBthanatos clarifies by saying:
So u/6138 says:
Basically sums up my sentiments too about how suicide prevention via psych holds and involuntary commitment is basically sanctioned and legalized criminality.
u/CTBthanatos also speaks his mind here:
I'd do just that (legally) if I can get away with exacting justice on those people who made Crew's life miserable. This man has suffered too many years and even begged the justice and medical system to let him go (passive euthanasia mind you), but oh no, the pro-lifers refuse to allow him a dignified death or any death at all; but to keep him alive just for their own egos. Absolutely disgusting. Hell, if I had Power of Attorney (PoA) and can make medical decisions for him, I'd make sure I can (legally) find him peace and rest. If I was a doctor and was not held civilly, legally, or criminally liable (in other words, if voluntary euthanasia is legal), I'd help the man end his suffering. Also, shame on his father for supporting the court and hospital's decision to keep his son alive. I get that losing a son or family member is painful, but the other person's pain is just as important (if not more than) as the parents' pain.
All in all, this is just one of the many stories of how despicable the majority of humanity (pro-lifers) are, even to someone who is clearly suffering immensely and has time and time again begged for a merciful, dignified death. But society decides, "No! You must live (until you die from natural causes) so we won't be sad and won't have to feel bad about a loss." So fuck society and the pro-lifers!
Nevertheless, there are some really good replies and comments by posters in that subreddit.
u/profoundexperience says:
We're all locked in various "prisons"... but Dan Crews is in a particularly hellish and sadistic one.
So now, we're defining all depression — whatsoever — as "erroneous": But, isn't it possible to be depressed due to an objective, realistic assessment of reality? What if it's not a "chemical imbalance" (physiological), but a true-valid reaction to reality?The head psychiatrist at ... says he is depressed and that overrides his ability to make a life or death decision.
And, if we define suicidality as a determinative "symptom" of depression, Dan Crews is now caught in a perverse "Catch-22" loop: He can't die because he's "depressed"... and he's depressed because he can't die.
He can only commit suicide if he's completely "happy" about the nature of life, including his own situation... That's some real Josef Mengele/Franz Kafka shirt going on there...
If I were Crews, I'd study "passive resistance" (a la Gandhi & King) and push that to it's ultimate limits.
But the absolute kicker for me is the line...
So Dan Crews needs to continue to exist to make you happy? Needs to continue to exist so you don't have to think about what his decision means? Fork you! Forcing others to live against their will for your benefit alone is just the epitome of wrongness... it's evil.Many in the disabled community are uncomfortable with Crews' decision
u/6138 makes an important logical point:
It's basically a catch-22, circular logic (a fallacy) because there is no way for someone to be rational and want to die to end their pain according to pro-lifers. So fuck the pro-lifers! All in all, I'd say if we are capable of holding criminals (really heinous ones even) accountable for their actions and finding them rational and fit to stand trial and sentenced accordingly, then people like Dan Crews is MORE than capable of making a permanent decision to end his torturous living hell.Exactly. It's almost laughable. People who want to die are clearly irrational, because if they weren't irrational, they wouldn't want to die. It's circular logic. No evidence has even been provided that wanting to die is necessarily a sign of irrationality.
u/CTBthanatos clarifies by saying:
That's all the arguments of suicide prevention people, "mental health professionals", many doctor's, and virtue signalers in general, we're ever based on, circular logic.
The only people who are irrational are the one's who call suicidal people/or people who want assisted dying and euthanasia "irrational" while they also violate their freedoms/rights/lock people up.
So u/6138 says:
Exactly. It's socially EDIT: permitted abuse. I believe in decades to come we will look back on todays treatment of people who wish to die the same way we look back on lobotomies and brain trepanning today.
Basically sums up my sentiments too about how suicide prevention via psych holds and involuntary commitment is basically sanctioned and legalized criminality.
u/CTBthanatos also speaks his mind here:
I'd tear the hospital/suicide prevention fanatics a new one for their irrational fetishization of trying to keep people alive involuntarily, but the mods comment censors on this sub are as hilariously pathetic and irrational as the suicide prevention fanatics we love to s**t on, subs like 2meirl4meirl would easily allow for comments ripping the hospital/suicide prevention advocates/doctors/etc apart xD
I'd do just that (legally) if I can get away with exacting justice on those people who made Crew's life miserable. This man has suffered too many years and even begged the justice and medical system to let him go (passive euthanasia mind you), but oh no, the pro-lifers refuse to allow him a dignified death or any death at all; but to keep him alive just for their own egos. Absolutely disgusting. Hell, if I had Power of Attorney (PoA) and can make medical decisions for him, I'd make sure I can (legally) find him peace and rest. If I was a doctor and was not held civilly, legally, or criminally liable (in other words, if voluntary euthanasia is legal), I'd help the man end his suffering. Also, shame on his father for supporting the court and hospital's decision to keep his son alive. I get that losing a son or family member is painful, but the other person's pain is just as important (if not more than) as the parents' pain.
All in all, this is just one of the many stories of how despicable the majority of humanity (pro-lifers) are, even to someone who is clearly suffering immensely and has time and time again begged for a merciful, dignified death. But society decides, "No! You must live (until you die from natural causes) so we won't be sad and won't have to feel bad about a loss." So fuck society and the pro-lifers!