J
Jessica5
Specialist
- May 22, 2019
- 347
A bit, but only while I was in there, mostly because being in there was like a prison and I had no idea when I'd be out. I've been in the ward 3 times. First stay was a 72 hour hold. The second time I was only there for a day. This last time was 3 weeks which was just recently. I was also on a 1:1 for the first week and a half which made things worse.Did the commitment actually make you even more suicidal than you previously were?
How does involuntary commitment work exactly? I've had a psychiatrist allude during one appointment that the things I was saying almost met the legal requirements. Would they have just politely asked me to comply or do they bring in the police or what?
I've never been hospitalised but reading this makes me so angry. How do pro-lifers justify what is basically legal kidnapping? The thought of being taken somewhere against my will, within the law, is unbelievable (if you haven't committed a crime)The legal requirement in order to be committed where I'm from is if you're a danger to yourself and/others and acting on those thoughts. Just being suicidial or wishing someone harm isn't going to get you involuntarily committed.
Complying is the easier option because technically it is voluntary then, although it's understood that if you say no, you'll be committed anyways at which point it is involuntary requiring a 72 hour hold. If it's voluntary, you have the option to leave if you want, depending on the situation and if they think you're safe enough.
Basically they do what they can to voluntarily commit you. They don't bring in the police, unless you're in a situation where you're not complying. It's pretty fucked up and you're kind of forced against your will. They can choose to court order a comittment if you refuse based on your history and the reason(s) you're there in the first place. That's why it's easier to play their game and say you will go because you don't want the courts involved.
I agree 100%. It's amoral. I was kept a week extra because I didn't want to take medications that I had absolutely no knowledge of. I was basically being punished for wanting to act out of my own free will. I don't know how this shit isn't illegal, but it's definitely not land of the "free" here in the US.I've never been hospitalised but reading this makes me so angry. How do pro-lifers justify what is basically legal kidnapping? The thought of being taken somewhere against my will, within the law, is unbelievable (if you haven't committed a crime)
Is the commitment seriously voluntary if they'll involuntarily commit you if you don't "voluntarily" commit yourself?