• Hey Guest,

    As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

  • Security update: At around 2:28AM EST, the site was labeled as malicious by Google erroneously, causing users to get a "Dangerous site" warning in most browsers. It appears that this was done by mistake and has been reversed by Google. It may take a few hours for you to stop seeing those warnings.

    If you're still getting these warnings, please let a member of staff know.
C

c824767

Specialist
Sep 2, 2019
358
Dear Justice Minister Lametti,

I call on you to respond to Quebec Superior Court Justice Baudouin's ruling in Truchon v. Canada on the unconstitutional "reasonably foreseeable" clause from Bill C-14, Canada's assisted dying law.

As you know, Justice Baudouin concluded that the "reasonably foreseeable" criterion imposes unnecessary, unbearable suffering on some patients who wish to access medical assistance in dying (MAID), and unfairly discriminates against them on the basis of their particular medical conditions.

This ruling has struck down this clause in Canada's Bill C-14, and is set to come into effect on March 11, 2020, if the legislation is not amended by the federal government before that date. I urge your government to remove this harmful rule from the law before March and to make sure it applies not just in Quebec, but also across Canada.

To date, this unfair and discriminatory requirement has prevented many Canadians with degenerative illnesses to exercise their right to a peaceful and dignified death. Others have starved and dehydrated themselves to fulfill this requirement, while a handful have died tragically by suicide because they felt they had no other choice. I believe this is extremely unfair — and not reflective of the spirit of our federal assisted dying law.

By delaying any further, you are effectively denying suffering people — whose eligibility doesn't meet the flawed requirements due to the nature of their particular illness — their constitutional right to choice.

Now is the time to take action to fix Canada's assisted dying law and ensure that sick and suffering people have fair access to their right to a peaceful death. I urge you to not wait any further to implement Justice Baudouin's ruling, and fulfill the commitment made by your government during the 2019 federal election to improve access for those seeking an assisted death.

Sincerely,
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: LegaliseIt!, xanth1467, Azzy69 and 1 other person
MeltingHeart

MeltingHeart

Visionary
Sep 9, 2019
2,151
Dear Justice Minister Lametti,

I call on you to respond to Quebec Superior Court Justice Baudouin's ruling in Truchon v. Canada on the unconstitutional "reasonably foreseeable" clause from Bill C-14, Canada's assisted dying law.

As you know, Justice Baudouin concluded that the "reasonably foreseeable" criterion imposes unnecessary, unbearable suffering on some patients who wish to access medical assistance in dying (MAID), and unfairly discriminates against them on the basis of their particular medical conditions.

This ruling has struck down this clause in Canada's Bill C-14, and is set to come into effect on March 11, 2020, if the legislation is not amended by the federal government before that date. I urge your government to remove this harmful rule from the law before March and to make sure it applies not just in Quebec, but also across Canada.

To date, this unfair and discriminatory requirement has prevented many Canadians with degenerative illnesses to exercise their right to a peaceful and dignified death. Others have starved and dehydrated themselves to fulfill this requirement, while a handful have died tragically by suicide because they felt they had no other choice. I believe this is extremely unfair — and not reflective of the spirit of our federal assisted dying law.

By delaying any further, you are effectively denying suffering people — whose eligibility doesn't meet the flawed requirements due to the nature of their particular illness — their constitutional right to choice.

Now is the time to take action to fix Canada's assisted dying law and ensure that sick and suffering people have fair access to their right to a peaceful death. I urge you to not wait any further to implement Justice Baudouin's ruling, and fulfill the commitment made by your government during the 2019 federal election to improve access for those seeking an assisted death.

Sincerely,
What's the specific case? Who is Truchon?
 
Ame

Ame

あめ
Nov 1, 2019
322
What's the specific case? Who is Truchon?

Jean Truchon and Nicole Gladu were (I use the past tense here because they have since received medical assistance in dying (MAID)) plaintiffs (parties demanderesses) in a court case that was launched in the autumn of 2017. Both suffered from chronic and severe medical conditions but were denied MAID because it had been determined that neither Truchon or Gladu were at the "end of their life". For some background, Canada's MAID eligibility conditions state that a person's death must be "reasonably foreseeable" (there is no formal definition for "reasonably foreseeable" by the way), however, Québec's version of the law (euthanasia was legalised in Québec a year before it was made legal in Canada) demands that a person be "at the end of life".

The Québec constitutional challenge targeted eligibility rules in Bill C-14 and in Bill 52 and a ruling was delivered by Québec Superior Court Justice Christine Baudouin on the 11th of September this year. As far as I know neither the federal or provincial governments have moved to appeal the Québec Superior Court's ruling. I was able to find the original ruling in French but I don't know if an official English translation has been published yet. It is quite long but I can include a translation of the verdict for those who are interested.
 
  • Like
Reactions: c824767 and KiraLittleOwl
MeltingHeart

MeltingHeart

Visionary
Sep 9, 2019
2,151
What's fuckd is that some violent murders have a more peaceful death (in cases of death penalty in some states) ...and yeah they may spend years in prison before hard but these ill people are probably imprisoned their pain, suffering, & bodies for years also...may seen a strange comparison to make- but for people that don't get the MAID they seek- there last months, years whatever must be like torture! & what hve they done to deserve that. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: c824767
C

c824767

Specialist
Sep 2, 2019
358
What's the specific case? Who is Truchon?
Truchon is the guy in Quebec who won in court that he can he assisted death even though it was not reasonably foreseeable when he would die.look it up. he did
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeltingHeart
Ironweed

Ironweed

Nauseated.
Nov 9, 2019
324
. Others have starved and dehydrated themselves to fulfill this requirement, while a handful have died tragically by suicide because they felt they had no other choice

Are they claiming what they are advocating is not suicide?
 
  • Like
Reactions: c824767
C

c824767

Specialist
Sep 2, 2019
358
What's the specific case? Who is Truchon?
Jean Truchon is one of 2 terminally ill persons who won the right to assisted suicide in appellate court even though they are not terminally ill. The other one is Nicole Gladu. It is considered a landmark case for Dying with Dignity type organizations and individuals who are campaigning for the right to die. Here is an article with fotos of the two and their responses to the ruling. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/medically-assisted-dying-law-overturned-quebec-1.5280702
What's fuckd is that some violent murders have a more peaceful death (in cases of death penalty in some states) ...and yeah they may spend years in prison before hard but these ill people are probably imprisoned their pain, suffering, & bodies for years also...may seen a strange comparison to make- but for people that don't get the MAID they seek- there last months, years whatever must be like torture! & what hve they done to deserve that. :(
Yeah Trump is just trying to get 5 males the death penalty for killing children. No one on federal death row has been executed since 2003, but on Thursday, William P. Barr, the attorney general, announced that the government was resuming executions, starting with five men convicted of killing children and women. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/us/capital-punishment-death-penalty.html
 
Last edited:
MeltingHeart

MeltingHeart

Visionary
Sep 9, 2019
2,151
Jean Truchon is one of 2 terminally ill persons who won the right to assisted suicide in appellate court even though they are not terminally ill. The other one is Nicole Gladu. It is considered a landmark case for Dying with Dignity type organizations and individuals who are campaigning for the right to die. Here is an article with fotos of the two and their responses to the ruling. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/medically-assisted-dying-law-overturned-quebec-1.5280702

Yeah Trump is just trying to get 5 males the death penalty for killing children. No one on federal death row has been executed since 2003, but on Thursday, William P. Barr, the attorney general, announced that the government was resuming executions, starting with five men convicted of killing children and women. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/us/capital-punishment-death-penalty.html
I don't understand the death penalty, not on a moral or religious level. But that I feel like it's an easy way out! Like they should have to endure being imprisoned for the rest of their lives instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: c824767
C

c824767

Specialist
Sep 2, 2019
358
I don't understand the death penalty, not on a moral or religious level. But that I feel like it's an easy way out! Like they should have to endure being imprisoned for the rest of their lives instead.
Some people love prison. Like my boyfriend, the idiot. I am serious he does not mind being in prison at all. 3 square and he makes friends with all the other inmates, most of them First Nations, and he gets a sleeping pill at night because they leave the lights on.