socrates

socrates

I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance.
Dec 3, 2019
275
She bullied him, shamed him and even guilt-ed him for not committing suicide. Conrad was in a vulnerable position and she used it for her own personal gain. He was also only 19. I think Conrad believed that the only person he could talk about his problems was her, and if he told her to get lost, he would be isolated, and studies show that being isolated has the same effects on the brain as torture. But I do agree, I don't think this meets the definition of coercion. What ever you want to call it, it was messed up and Michelle Carter is a monster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlreadyGone, ghostspace, Misanthrope and 10 others
MeltingHeart

MeltingHeart

Visionary
Sep 9, 2019
2,151
Ye
She bullied him, shamed him and even guilt-ed him for not committing suicide. Conrad was in a vulnerable position and she used it for her own personal gain. He was also only 19. I think Conrad believed that the only person he could talk about his problems was her, and if he told her to get lost, he would be isolated, and studies show that being isolated has the same effects on the brain as torture. But I do agree, I don't think this meets the definition of coercion. What ever you want to call it, it was messed up and Michelle Carter is a monster.
Yeah some people are simple more vunerable/ damaged in some way and much more easily manipulated / coerced than others. Not everyone is strong enough to say f**k off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ALittleBurden, maka, Hydrokhoos and 1 other person
BlueWidow

BlueWidow

Visionary
Oct 6, 2019
2,179
maka

maka

this is for you, mi cuervito 𓇢𓆸
Apr 23, 2019
161
Correct me if I am wrong, but is coercion the same as abetting a suicide? Bc i thought that was already illegal, or at least a criminal offense of some sort.
 
socrates

socrates

I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance.
Dec 3, 2019
275
Correct me if I am wrong, but is coercion the same as abetting a suicide? Bc i thought that was already illegal, or at least a criminal offense of some sort.
It depends on the state your in. In the common wealth of Massachusetts, there was no law criminalizing speech that leads to suicide. That's why they had to stretch the involuntary manslaughter statute to comical levels so they could charge her with something.
I don't think there were laws criminalizing abetting suicide eather. If there were they probably could of charged her with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astral316 and maka
S

Shakespear's Brother

Member
Sep 10, 2019
297
Really what is most concerning in this case, and should be of enormous interest to those who are potentially subject to US legal jurisdiction, is that Michelle Carter was found guilty, in part, because she did not call for help and the judge said she had a legal obligation to do so.

In this case, it was the judge saying Michelle's actions caused Conrad to get back into the truck and then she had the legal obligation to call for help.

However, it's not hard to see how crazy prosecutors will one day claim a person is liable simply because they did not call for help. Witnessing someone ctb, like as a supportive friend or spouse or whatever, will become a crime, if the person does not call for help.

It's really fucking shitty.

(holy shit I said "call for help" like a million times)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Astral316
TheLastSacrifice

TheLastSacrifice

Student
Feb 14, 2020
174
Carter was a total bitch who should be shamed for her actions and held socially accountable but there is no excuse to invoke manslaughter charges on the girl. Ridiculous.