To Cyagangy:
First of all:
Whether suicide is morally right or morally wrong, depends on the situation. But in most cases, suicide is actually morally right. But most people don't understand that, because most people haven't experienced true suffering in life. They often think they have - but they usually haven't. (Because if they had, then they wouldn't have had any problems with understanding, accepting and respecting people's right to commit suicide - and assisted suicide would have been institutionalized, and would have been available to anyone of a mature age.)
Second of all:
There is no "Hell" in the afterlife; there is only "Heaven".
You should replace religious books with modern research about the afterlife. All religions are quite simply wrong about several things - although they all get some aspects right, of course. So, always remember that religions contain a lot of heresy, and that their "holy books" are heavily influenced by the authors' agenda.
And also, think about what you'd actually expect from a truly fair, reasonable, intelligent and loving God. Anything that relates to "Hell" and/or blame/judgement/condemnation/punishment, will then go right out of the window - because all souls will be equally valuable, in the eyes of a truly fair, reasonable, intelligent and loving God, no matter what those souls do/don't do.
And remember, if God truly is a fair, reasonable, intelligent and loving being, then God won't send a soul to a place like earth (where human desires can easily lead a soul to do truly evil/cruel things, and where the human experience can easily lead a soul to commit suicide) - and then turn around and blame/judge/condemn/punish the soul for its actions afterwards. God is just as much to blame for whatever a soul does/doesn't do on earth - as God is the one who sent the soul there, while knowing full well what humans are truly capable of, and what kind of place earth truly is. It's like, "Hey, God - what the fuck did you expect?!".
In other words:
A fair, reasonable, intelligent and loving God, wouldn't tempt a hungry mouse with cheese - and then turn around and blame/judge/condemn/punish the mouse for eating the cheese.
(By the way:
God isn't actually a "person"; God is actually more like a "source" in the spirit-world. And angels don't exist. Instead, it's actually our personal spirit-guides and soul-friends that people are having contact with, when they have contact with "God" or "angels".)
Besides, I've heard that the religious concept of "Hell", was actually invented, or at least became popularized, during the medieval times - because life was so bad for most people during those times, that a lot of people committed suicide. And that resulted in religion having to invent some kind of "ultimate threat", to keep people from committing suicide, and thereby maintain its power. (Because how can religion have any power, if most of its followers commit suicide?)
I'm not an historian myself - but it sure makes sense that something like that would be the origin of the modern notion of "Hell".
Regarding on proofs claims. Most of ppl that claims for proofs cannot even proof almost anything.
They learn how to spell proofs but they dont know how to build any new proof.
how do you proof bacteria exists? How do you proof columb law? How do you proof how much speed of light? Have you ever tryed before all of those.
All knowledge build by humans rely both in trust and desire to reform it. Both are necessary. In order to start learning science hope in science is worth is requiered, there is a first step either delusion or faith.
Sorry for my English.
It's actually very easy to prove things, when you actually bring valid evidences to the table, and combine them with undeniable logic. However, this requires high intelligence and rationality - which a lot of people unfortunately lack (which is the main reason why the world is so fucked up, and why it will always remain fucked up).
And the belief in good/proper science (as opposed to bad/poor science), isn't based on faith or delusion; it's based on actual, practical results.
there is no real proof of hell or any afterlife or reincarnation , or of ghosts, spirits souls etc. not one piece of evidence or reproducible experiment.
I can assure you that there is. You (like most people who don't explore this stuff) just don't know about the evidences (even scientific evidences) that actually exist for these things.
Remember, you only know what you know; you don't know what you don't know.
You're going to have such a big, pleasant surprise, when the day comes... I can promise you that :) Mark. My. Words.
You're in a "dream" right now (along with all other creatures on this earth) - but one day, you will wake up to the real world. I know - because I've been there. It's even realer than this world, and you become the full version of yourself (which is currently limited, in your human form).
You simply have no idea what awaits you... :)
