I have heard some people say that physical abuse is always straightforward and objective, while verbal and emotional abuse is subjective. That being said, you could say well, if one person slaps another person in the face, maybe they had a lot of anger/emotions to get out and that was their way of expressing it? What about cultures where it is normal to settle disputes that way or by fighting or in the old days when men hit each other/fought out of anger more often and it wasn't always an offense in a court of law? Is a person who cries for help during a medical emergency emotionally manipulating people towards helping them instead of getting on with their day and ignoring them? Just being present with another person or asking them for something potentially influences what they will do or feel. I know that there are ways of treating people that feel very painful and devastating to many, and I don't normally approve of violence due to the devastating effect it can have on a victim, (and how does one know that one has the right to cause harm to/ retaliate against another person anyway..) but what if no country had fought back during world war 2? I don't know one single person who wants the world to be run by nazis. What about domestic violence victims who fight back in self defence? Are they being abusive in that moment, even though they are saving their own lives and possibly their children's'? It is a complicated question, but if something someone has done makes you feel unsafe or suicidal, you are entitled to get out/get away from the person if that's what you need, and if you notice a repeating pattern of something happening it may very well be deliberate harm as opposed to purely accidental.