DoNotLet2
Wizard
- Oct 14, 2019
- 684
Hello
It is just my opinion and I wanna ask a few questions.
First of all I'm not an expert in economy barely a student. Rich people I listen to define capitalism as a system with low government interposing and high competition meaning there must be always a few enterprises competing to satisfy the customer's needs whatever they are. Meaning less than 4 companies (there should be more though from what I know) in one field and we're not talking about capitalism. The government only intervenes when the competition is in danger. The rich people also say there can't be clear capitalism because the government will always intervene. You can't sell drugs, you have to pay higher or lower taxes. So there can be only partial capitalism which is high competition and low interposing.
But there other people are defining capitalism as lack of social support like the dole or state hospitals. And I'm asking what is the right definition of the capitalism?
Ok so, main topic.
Are the underprivileged people, who really do suffer, the people who work for the entire society? I mean men work for the women and they lack privileges, don't they? They can't cry and they are abused in other ways I can't describe, I'm not a man. The women are allowed to cry, to be sad, to not feel like working but not all. When a woman doesn't work and lives thanks to her man it's fine. Is it fine when a man doesn't work and lives thanks to his woman?
I have a little bit higher intelligence than normal people and I'm not favored at school and society even though I'm a woman. Because I can deal with things right? I noticed less intelligent people might have it easier and be more indulged if they look poor and helpless.
Hm. People worry about disabled one's right when they look disabled enough. Because when somebody isn't disabled they can work for themselves?
I'm autistic. I never had autistic privileges because I'm not autistic enough, am I? I am not bothered by stimulus such as too much light or smell. I see so many autistic people who are severely disabled from autism and they do have privileges. But I do not and I have problems when I need clear information because people don't want to give me it. I was even discriminated by autistic non suicidal community. When I was saying something rude, they were mad at me, but when they were saying something rude they were like "we are severely autistic we can".
Hm. I came to the conclusion. The underprivileged people are the people who can work for themselves. The people who are privileged and can order around are people who are weak and poor. Poor meaning looking helpless.
So I just want to discuss those 2 topics. Because I think we live in a society that is like socialism. And I also think we define capitalism badly (capitalism should be defined as constant competition).
Of course I can be totally wrong so let's talk.
It is just my opinion and I wanna ask a few questions.
First of all I'm not an expert in economy barely a student. Rich people I listen to define capitalism as a system with low government interposing and high competition meaning there must be always a few enterprises competing to satisfy the customer's needs whatever they are. Meaning less than 4 companies (there should be more though from what I know) in one field and we're not talking about capitalism. The government only intervenes when the competition is in danger. The rich people also say there can't be clear capitalism because the government will always intervene. You can't sell drugs, you have to pay higher or lower taxes. So there can be only partial capitalism which is high competition and low interposing.
But there other people are defining capitalism as lack of social support like the dole or state hospitals. And I'm asking what is the right definition of the capitalism?
Ok so, main topic.
Are the underprivileged people, who really do suffer, the people who work for the entire society? I mean men work for the women and they lack privileges, don't they? They can't cry and they are abused in other ways I can't describe, I'm not a man. The women are allowed to cry, to be sad, to not feel like working but not all. When a woman doesn't work and lives thanks to her man it's fine. Is it fine when a man doesn't work and lives thanks to his woman?
I have a little bit higher intelligence than normal people and I'm not favored at school and society even though I'm a woman. Because I can deal with things right? I noticed less intelligent people might have it easier and be more indulged if they look poor and helpless.
Hm. People worry about disabled one's right when they look disabled enough. Because when somebody isn't disabled they can work for themselves?
I'm autistic. I never had autistic privileges because I'm not autistic enough, am I? I am not bothered by stimulus such as too much light or smell. I see so many autistic people who are severely disabled from autism and they do have privileges. But I do not and I have problems when I need clear information because people don't want to give me it. I was even discriminated by autistic non suicidal community. When I was saying something rude, they were mad at me, but when they were saying something rude they were like "we are severely autistic we can".
Hm. I came to the conclusion. The underprivileged people are the people who can work for themselves. The people who are privileged and can order around are people who are weak and poor. Poor meaning looking helpless.
So I just want to discuss those 2 topics. Because I think we live in a society that is like socialism. And I also think we define capitalism badly (capitalism should be defined as constant competition).
Of course I can be totally wrong so let's talk.