• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
N

noname223

Archangel
Aug 18, 2020
6,749
This isn't equivalent to revive someone who died. More in the sense who do you think had a good impact on the community. However, in many cases we don't know the reasons why someone was banned. Someone could be a creep in private messages while at the same time present themselves as a good and kind member on the public forum. There is someone I am thinking about who did somethling like that. I am not sure whether this person was actually banned but the person was exposed and I think the person didn't come to the forum because of this.

I think overall @Chinaski had a good impact on the community. He was a controversial member though. But I liked his stances in favor of trans people, in favor of women and against incels. Moreover, we (and some others) argumented that the pro-mortalists on this forum should be constrained in forcing their ideology to others on here.

I think though chinaski had probably a lot warnings. And in some of his posts he was quite rude. I am not 100% certain what happened so he got banned. Maybe he told someone to kill themselves in an argument. Which fully justifies getting banned because this is a red line. I would hope for a different time line though where this didn't happen. Or he could apologize to the other person and promise to never do this again. Even though, I think apologizing wasn't something he was good in. I think though he would never want someone on here to actually commit suicide. I think he did a lot of good by challeging the dominance of pro-mortalists on here. And at the start he was pretty contrarian and alone in doing that. He contributed to the fact that this forum isn't a pro-death echo chamber.

What do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: katagiri83

Similar threads