B
BlueThoth
Member
- Oct 17, 2018
- 5
If someone were killed by another human or died due to illness, the pain isn't as much as to compared to a suicide. Why does losing someone to suicide hurt more than losing someone to something else?
If someone were killed by another human or died due to illness, the pain isn't as much as to compared to a suicide. Why does losing someone to suicide hurt more than losing someone to something else?
I totally agree. I was shocked when I learned what suicide survivors means... Of course, I thought it meant you had attempted suicide and survived but it doesn't. It's a label for family / friends of people who have died by suicide. Very strange to me but that's a debate for another day...
Anyways, those left behind feel guilt and blame themselves:
'I should have known'
'I could have helped'
'I should have done something, it's my fault'
'if only they got the help and treatment they needed, then they could have been saved'
Judgement from others 'you should have known' and 'why didn't you do anything to stop this'
And there's still social stigma about it here, why is why coroner's vastly under-report suicides.
Religion has been very harsh to people who die by suicide as well by disallowing burial and excommunicating members.
Then there's the not understanding of the choice 'why would they choose to do this'
'But you have so much to live for' etc...
There's also more of a risk of suicide, if you know someone who has which is why the government puts so many resources into this group of family / friends.
It's a complex social issue with many layers but basically, it's all about them...
If someone were killed by another human or died due to illness, the pain isn't as much as to compared to a suicide. Why does losing someone to suicide hurt more than losing someone to something else?
The thought of a loved one's life getting so bad that they felt like ending it was the only option is heartbreaking beyond what most diseases and accidents could cause.
I think one more thing that people haven't mentioned is anger. when someone is murdered loved ones are usually very angry with the perpetrator, when you murder yourself so to speak loved one often feel anger at you because your actions hurt them so badly. it's hard to reconcile that anger, with the love, the guilt, the sadness - all the directed at one person. It's much more complex then grieving other types of loss.
But why would this be any more painful that, say, cancer that lasted a few decades? Or some other slow-acting terminal disease?
Was gonna add something similar. When people are dealing with the loss of someone who was murdered, there is a very definitive place to direct blame. With suicide, the big scary taboo that it is, people don't want to blame the victim, though the victim is technically the one that does it. And without that someone to blame, those feelings go unresolved.
I think with disease, people have more time to experience and process their grieving. Suicide is rarely expected, so it's like the grief that would have been otherwise spread out is instead hitting them all at once. Or something.
I think because they may take it personally. They're upset that the person chose to die which makes it different from an accident or murder.
And the fact that most people can't understand what suicidally depressed people go through unless they've been in that state themselves. Same with someone dealing with chronic pain, physical impairment or chronic health issues/disease : people will look at them from the outside and not think it's so bad because they are not dealing with that agony themselves. They can't fathom that ctb is a logical choice.
I think that the notion of preventability that hurts people more. There's a somewhat brutal situation here - if it was inevitable, it means that you weren't important to the person who's dead, and that's often difficult to accept; if it was preventable, you keep asking what you could have done to prevent it, and question whether they were important enough to you.
I disagree. You are trying to turn something insanely complicated into a false dichotomy. Preventibility? Someone could live their entire life even though they despise it. That doesn't mean they were better off choosing life it. Killing yourself also has little to do with important to people. If someone isn't better off-you are suppose to support that period- to say you know a person who took their life was actually better off alive is beyond arrogant.