• Hey Guest,

    If you would still like to donate, you still can. We have more than enough funds to cover operating expenses for quite a while, so don't worry about donating if you aren't able. If you want to donate something other than what is listed, you can contact RainAndSadness.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

Just4ride

Just4ride

Member
May 13, 2019
69
The rate of lethal violence is 7 times higher than the average for all mammals

A new study of 1,024 mammal species has determined which animals are the most vicious killers of their own kind. Killer whales perhaps? Pit bulls maybe? For the answer, just look in the mirror.


"Step back and view our species objectively from the outside, the way a zoologist would carefully observe any other animal, or see us the way every other creature perceives human beings. The brutal reality could not be more evident or more horrifying. We are the most relentless yet oblivious killers on Earth.
"Our violence operates far outside the bounds of any other species. Human beings kill anything. Slaughter is a defining behavior of our species. We kill all other creatures, and we kill our own. Read today's paper. Read yesterday's, or read tomorrow's. The enormous industry of print and broadcast journalism serves predominantly to document our killing. Violence exists in the animal world, of course, but on a far different scale. Carnivores kill for food; we kill our family members, our children, our parents, our spouses, our brothers and sisters, our cousins and in-laws. We kill strangers. We kill people who are different from us, in appearance, beliefs, race, and social status. We kill ourselves in suicide. We kill for advantage and for revenge, we kill for entertainment: the Roman Coliseum, drive-by shootings, bullfights, hunting and fishing, animal roadkill in an instantaneous reflex for sport. We kill friends, rivals, coworkers, and classmates. Children kill children, in school and on the playground. Grandparents, parents, fathers, mothers--all kill and all of them are the targets of killing…" -R. Douglas Fields, Why We Snap, p. 286, 2016.
article continues after advertisement
After writing those words in my new book Why We Snap, I have been frequently challenged for being overly harsh on the species that has chosen to christen itself "sapiens," (the wise one). But I was not offering social commentary. I was providing an objective, zoological description of this species. This week Maria Gomez and colleagues, Zoologists working in Spain, published the results of their in-depth research in a report in the journal Nature on the evolutionary roots of the human propensity to kill their own kind. The researchers compiled data on lethal violence within 1,024 species of mammals, and the results verify my description of us. The analysis shows that deaths caused by other members of the same species is responsible for 0.3% of all deaths on average for all mammals, but the rate of lethal violence among Homo sapiens is 7 times higher. Together with our primate ancestors we stand out as aberrations in our penchant to kill our own kind.
The reasons can be traced back to our primate ancestors, which are exceptionally violent creatures, killing each other at a rate of 2.3% like we do. These data indicate that the incessant repetition throughout recorded history and in prehistoric times of murder and war among all cultures of human beings has its roots in our evolutionary stalk. In part, the reasons for this rampant self-killing appear to relate to our big brains and the conscious awareness and conniving that big brainpower makes possible, but primarily because of two other key aspects of Homo sapiens and other primates: fierce territoriality and living in social groups. Across all mammalian species, conspecific deadly violence is highly correlated with these two factors. A double hit of both factors compounds the violence. Whales and bats are highly social, but not territorial, for example, and they have very low rates of killing their own kind. Human beings are highly social but extremely territorial--"Trespassers will be shot!" "He cut into my lane!"
article continues after advertisement
When researchers examined how different types of social groups of humans affect the rate of killing, they found that lethal violence was common in present-day societies organized into bands or tribes, and severe violence is frequent in chiefdoms because of territorial disputes, population and resource pressures, and competition for political reasons, but violence decreased in state-run societies. Presumably, the authors conclude, this is because socio-political organizations of populations in state-run societies that are designed to suppress violence and respond to it, act to inhibit the innate, genetically-predisposed propensity of people to kill each other. Consider, for example, if there were no police to call, what would you have to do?
Missing from the analysis, but unquestionably the most important factor in violence among humans and other mammals, is sex. Males (boys, men, and the males of other mammalian species) are inherently violent, and they are responsible for the vast majority of violent death. This is a relic of the traditional male role in defending territory and social organization that our human and non-human mammalian ancestors practiced.
We are evolutionarily and genetically predisposed to snap in deadly violence, but in comparison to other animals, biology has indeed endowed our species with extraordinary "sapiens." The problem is that the neural circuits of violence that cause us to explode in rage and violence are deep in the brain beneath the cerebral cortex where consciousness arises. The frontal lobes of the brain can squelch these circuits of rage that we share with other violent mammals, but this "top-down" conscious control of our violent impulses is slower to act than the circuits of explosive violence deep in our brain. Understanding this neurocircuitry is vital. Territoriality and social interactions are the "E" for environment, and "T" for tribe, triggers of sudden aggression in the mnemonic "LIFEMORTS," which is a convenient way to learn to recognize the 9 triggers of rage. Each of these triggers of rage activates different neural circuits in the brain's threat-detection mechanism. Learning about these biologically and genetically embedded triggers of violence can enable us to engage the part of the human brain that distinguishes it from all other mammalian brains--the forebrain. Circuits from the forebrain to the brain's threat detection circuits can squelch sudden aggression and violence if there is even a split second to think, be it on the road, in domestic life, within societies, or nations at war. Everyone should learn the LIFEMORTS; especially in an election year.
The nomenclature, sapiens, seems an Escher-like ambiguity shifting freely between science and sarcasm. Perhaps this species would be more aptly named Homo nudus, the naked ape, not sapiens. So it seems when miles on the road are marked in incidents of rage--clocked at one every 20 min on average. One wonders when Orlando is no longer Disney. When sun and glitz cease to be French Nice. When children don't build sand castles on the beach, but wash up lifeless like dead seaweed and broken bottles. When skyscrapers are scraped up, as airplanes are mutated into missiles. When houses of worship become slaughterhouses of hate. When millions flee across the globe from their homes in Syria bombed into a manmade hell on Earth. When a child sits stunned in an ambulance having watched his home and family destroyed by deliberate attack. When a boy trades a handgun for a father and projects his personal pain upon playmates, preferring to become a child murderer. When police in moments of fear fire first and question later, and when they are picked off by a sniper like points in a pointless video game. Violence is in our genes and in our environment, but so too are territoriality and society. These things we will not change. Genes change at a glacial pace. But territory and society shift constantly and they are molded by man. There is hope through understanding the science of human violence, as we can see. Some men do deliberate and decide to forfeit their life if necessary to rush into a war zone wearing white helmets to dig a broken child out of rubble.

 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Manaaja, Broken Chimera, TheDevilsAngel and 6 others
been_there

been_there

Life cares only for itself.
Jun 5, 2019
297
Most who kill themselves are well aware of humanity's failings. Its part of the issue.

Whereas its all the inferior, inadequate thickos who kill others.

Yay evolution, forward to monkeyworld.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Good4Nothing and Crematedashes
Rollo

Rollo

No pasaran
Aug 13, 2018
461
Yeah I remember there was an episode of Simpsons or Futurama where they joked on this emotionally driven motive in a short scene where scientists decided to make the most lethal predator and tah-tah a human appears cue the dramatic music :smiling:

Humans are violent and do kill but the article is exaggerating just to make the dramatic point. Even if the data is correct the only reason human rate of inter-specie killings is 7 times higher on average is cause other species don't kill humans all that much these days. They say the average is 0.3% for all mamals, and 2.3% for humans. Which is kinda low as far as humans go. I mean who's killing the rest then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crematedashes
SinisterKid

SinisterKid

Visionary
Jun 1, 2019
2,113
Stick 8 billion people on a small rock floating somewhere in the universe and it is going to create a shitstorm sooner or later. :wink:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sprite_Geist, not_a_robot, Severen and 1 other person
throwaway123

throwaway123

Hell0
Aug 5, 2018
1,446
what about ants? Ever heard about the ant wars? Billions die every day.
 
V

vulgareconomics

Member
Apr 5, 2019
31
idk why this makes you conclude it's genetic rather than social
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrumpyFrog
not_a_robot

not_a_robot

"i hope the leaving is joyful, & never to return"
May 30, 2019
2,121
Agreed. we are the product of millions of years of evolution in which only the ones most wiling to kill survived. We are not a nice species.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Good4Nothing and Crematedashes
Sitokirment

Sitokirment

Member
Jun 6, 2019
37
Humanities' penchant for killing competition is what gave us the ability to evolve intelligence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: not_a_robot
Severen

Severen

Enlightened
Jun 30, 2018
1,819
I wouldn't go that far because we are so much more than that but I would say, we all definitely have a side inside of us, that can be switched on to make us into efficient killers. All of us... No exceptions. If there were humans that did not have that side to them, they became extinct a long time ago.
 
Severen

Severen

Enlightened
Jun 30, 2018
1,819
Stick 8 billion people on a small rock floating somewhere in the universe and it is going to create a shitstorm sooner or later. :wink:

And what is pathetic is some humans have the level of intelligence to deal with this problem but of course, every time they try, they die way too soon or never have any real power...
 
V

vulgareconomics

Member
Apr 5, 2019
31
Y'all need to read Mutual Aid because humans are an extremely social species that, like most species, survives by cooperation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Final Escape
T

TimeToDie

Mage
Jun 13, 2019
521
The rate of lethal violence is 7 times higher than the average for all mammals
Are they counting suicide as "lethal violence?" Suicide would vastly increase the level of violence for humans since in the US two-thirds of gun deaths are suicide.
 
not_a_robot

not_a_robot

"i hope the leaving is joyful, & never to return"
May 30, 2019
2,121
So this guy ctb? OP?
propaganda.
 
F

Final Escape

I’ve been here too long
Jul 8, 2018
4,348
No, but certain groups tend to have higher rates of violence as opposed to others.