E

Epsilon0

Enlightened
Dec 28, 2019
1,874
I got caught in a somewhat unpleasant situation with someone in my family, and, being slightly given to hyperboles, I immediatedly thought of the famous line "l'enfer, c'est les autres" - "hell is other people", because the person in question felt like hell to me in that instant.

But then I got to thinking how curious my interpretation of reality was. How it really wasn't my own, but rather inherited from someone else - the others, as in "hell is other people".

I am not talking about the quote itself, but rather language in general. I have to define myself, my suffering, my relation to death and life with concepts that other people gave me.

And those concepts shape my reality. The simple fact that I chose one word instead of another changes my understanding of everything, because each word carries meaning, pre-established meaning.

This troubles me greatly. The fact that I cannot understand myself without language, and language is a hand-me-down robe.

Makes med wonder why do we even bother talking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sensei and GoodPersonEffed
GoodPersonEffed

GoodPersonEffed

Brevity is my middle name, but my name was TL
Jan 11, 2020
6,727
Language doesn't work if we don't agree on meanings. Think of how many arguments there are because folks don't agree on what God is.

Have you studied Saussure? Barthes' Mythologies? Semiotics?
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Epsilon0, Sensei and Cevapcici
E

Epsilon0

Enlightened
Dec 28, 2019
1,874
Saussure is a titan and his theory on the relationship between the signifier and the signified laid much of the foundation of modern linguistics and chomskian grammar. But saussurean linguistics has its limitations as it stops as soon as it reaches the conclusion that language is arbitrary.

And it is precisely what lies beyond that border which interests me.

What I try to get at, lies more in line with Barthes' theories. Words are only arbitrary from a grammatical point of view. But they are not socially and culturally arbitrary. They carry beliefs, stereotypes, positive and negative evaluations.


As soon as I say something I convey more meaning than I intend to. If I say I am depressed, the person I talk to suddenly gets a whole picture of what I mean - that picture is the reposit of culture and ideology. It does not neccesseraly reflect what I mean.

But the question is even deeper than that, because even I am part of the same system, so I must talk inside of it. I cannot even conceive of myself outside the world of words and signs of my culture. So, even I don't know if I mean what I say, or if I say what I am trained to mean.

Sure, we must agree on meaning, but what meaning?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sensei
Mr2005

Mr2005

Don't shoot the messenger, give me the gun
Sep 25, 2018
3,622
Other person here, hello
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: voyager, Sensei, Epsilon0 and 1 other person
GoodPersonEffed

GoodPersonEffed

Brevity is my middle name, but my name was TL
Jan 11, 2020
6,727
Saussure is a titan and his theory on the relationship between the signifier and the signified laid much of the foundation of modern linguistics and chomskian grammar. But saussurean linguistics has its limitations as it stops as soon as it reaches the conclusion that language is arbitrary.

And it is precisely what lies beyond that border which interests me.

What I try to get at, lies more in line with Barthes' theories. Words are only arbitrary from a grammatical point of view. But they are not socially and culturally arbitrary. They carry beliefs, stereotypes, positive and negative evaluations.


As soon as I say something I convey more meaning than I intend to. If I say I am depressed, the person I talk to suddenly gets a whole picture of what I mean - that picture is the reposit of culture and ideology. It does not neccesseraly reflect what I mean.

But the question is even deeper than that, because even I am part of the same system, so I must talk inside of it. I cannot even conceive of myself outside the world of words and signs of my culture. So, even I don't know if I mean what I say, or if I say what I am trained to mean.

Sure, we must agree on meaning, but what meaning?

I have never engaged with Chomsky, but I am 100% aligned and in agreement with what you wrote here. How refreshing.

Saussure helped me understand Barthes. Foucault and post-colonial studies helped me understand power, and Barthes. Semiotics helped me understand that humans make meaning, even as meaning does not exist, it helps to reach some understanding and, as you point out, limits understanding. Barthes helped me understand culture and power, and how they control others and validate themselves. All of this helped me analyze and create some boundaries; they have had the most powerful influences on my daily life and I'm grateful for having learned from them.

EDIT: Saussure also helped me understand Gautama Buddha's assertion that there are no signs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sensei
E

Epsilon0

Enlightened
Dec 28, 2019
1,874
Other person here, hello


:D
Best reply ever!


@GoodPersonEffed

Yes, language is power in its purest form. You call something by a certain name and it becomes that very thing. In Alice in Wonderland, there is a scene with a mother who keeps calling her baby a pig. And a few pages later you find out that the baby actually turned into a pig. Lewis Caroll was onto something.

What bothers me as I get older is the discovery that communication is impossible. It may be because of the way language works. It is imprecise, vague, made-up, and yet it wields an immense power.

I have come to believe that our whole lives are a series of missunderstandings due to failure to communicate. Not even our closest and most profound relationships are safe from that. As someone once said: the greatest problem with commucation is the illusion that it has taken place.

There really is nothing to hang on to in this world. It's all quick sand...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Mr2005, GoodPersonEffed and Sensei
GoodPersonEffed

GoodPersonEffed

Brevity is my middle name, but my name was TL
Jan 11, 2020
6,727
I so enjoyed this thread, and your poetic posts elsewhere. Of course I loved your "This is not an apple," but I am thoroughly enjoying your one last candle before the darkness comes. Thank you for the light you've brought me here and in other threads. :heart:
 
E

Epsilon0

Enlightened
Dec 28, 2019
1,874
I so enjoyed this thread, and your poetic posts elsewhere. Of course I loved your "This is not an apple," but I am thoroughly enjoying your one last candle before the darkness comes. Thank you for the light you've brought me here and in other threads. :heart:


Sisters, then! Until the darkness comes. ❤️

Signed
Epsilon, Coco the cat & Kiki the dog
 
GoodPersonEffed

GoodPersonEffed

Brevity is my middle name, but my name was TL
Jan 11, 2020
6,727
Sisters, then! Until the darkness comes. ❤

Signed
Epsilon, Coco the cat & Kiki the dog

I LAUGHED OUT LOUD!!!!

Amen, sister. :heart:
 
  • Love
Reactions: Epsilon0

Similar threads

Sarros
Replies
5
Views
204
Suicide Discussion
lostmilo
lostmilo
Hunterer
Replies
8
Views
179
Suicide Discussion
MyTimeIsUp
M
lostmilo
Replies
11
Views
232
Suicide Discussion
depthss
depthss
ham and potatoes
Replies
7
Views
156
Suicide Discussion
ceilng_tile
C
dinosavr
Replies
2
Views
116
Suicide Discussion
wondering&wandering
wondering&wandering