dödsängel
Member
- Mar 15, 2023
- 95
Growing up I was a very ambitious child
I always dreamt of being some sort of elite in whatever field I was in, rich, extremely successful, powerful, whatever
A goal like this requires a lot of work though which was at odds with my natural tendency to be lazy
Despite this, just through last minute rushing, good bullshitting etc, I managed to pull my way through life while being lazy
I'm not saying this to brag, but despite some setbacks I'm currently in a very good university with a really good financial path.
Yet I know that most of this is due to luck. Me just being put in good situations, having the right upbringing, parents, so on and so forth.
The reason I bring this up is because I have this ideal career situation set up, and I always had ambitions since I was young. But I don't see the point or merit in any of it. I always see normies suggesting to losers to get a job or something of the sort, but how is that supposed to hold any merit in itself? Especially if it's a minimum wage job with terrible pay and conditions.
I don't see what inherent value "working" has, naturally if you can get the same outcome with less effort wouldn't you want to do so? I understand the need for a goal, passion, or something to pass time, yet can't that just be your own passion and not some shit job that really only benefits someone else?
I don't really see the value in "contributing to society" either. I mean yes, I understand that I am a part of society, and I have society to thank for not being killed and eaten, getting food, water, etc fairly easily, but at least for me, everything I get from society is transactional. Yes, I may get a house, food, water, electricity, transportation.. but this is only because I paid for it, which in itself money is just made up by society
maybe I'm just rambling, but I hope I'm conveying my point well
The BIGGEST loser trait people often cite is the idea of someone not working, living with their parents, etc etc.. and I really don't see how that's so bad? How is just typing numbers into a spreadsheet any more valuable?
Being honest, most careers are terrible, and the few that genuinely pay well require either countless years of school, going to an elite college, familial connections, etc, etc, and even then that's just not accounting for your own strengths and weaknesses.
People often shit on some rich trust fund kid living off of their parents money, claiming that they didn't earn it, but do we earn anything? A lot of models and actors get rich off of their looks alone, which they were just born with. Most people don't have the intelligence to become doctors or programmers. So on. Who cares if they didn't earn it? Is, say, Michael Jordan's achievements worth any less because if he were a few inches shorter (something entirely genetic) he probably wouldn't have been in the NBA? Not to mention his insane genetic traits, skills, etc. Of course he worked hard and had a good mindset, but you understand my point
And going back to the value of goals and merits, why does this have to be through such a system? I think I'd get much more fulfillment from being a NEET that had a genuine hobby he pursued all the time (say music or something) than working some shit office job. Most people don't really have any meaningful achievements either, so I don't really understand that.
I get that societal functioning is dependent upon this too, but one can acknowledge that yet still realize what's better for an individual or from an individualistic lens. Regardless, we can move past all of this entirely with things like AI and automation.
If you ask me personally, why I was ambitious, it's a very simple and blunt answer. It was really just due to my ego, I thought that I was better than everyone else so I deserved to be above them and the best of the best in life. To do whatever I wanted, have luxury, get worshipped by people, etc. I know full well how much of an asshole that makes me look, but I'm just being honest here. I think that sort of conveys my point to, the fact that I only saw it as worthy because of my own ego rather than any inherent value. But I don't know, I could be wrong.
Anyone have any differing opinions?
I always dreamt of being some sort of elite in whatever field I was in, rich, extremely successful, powerful, whatever
A goal like this requires a lot of work though which was at odds with my natural tendency to be lazy
Despite this, just through last minute rushing, good bullshitting etc, I managed to pull my way through life while being lazy
I'm not saying this to brag, but despite some setbacks I'm currently in a very good university with a really good financial path.
Yet I know that most of this is due to luck. Me just being put in good situations, having the right upbringing, parents, so on and so forth.
The reason I bring this up is because I have this ideal career situation set up, and I always had ambitions since I was young. But I don't see the point or merit in any of it. I always see normies suggesting to losers to get a job or something of the sort, but how is that supposed to hold any merit in itself? Especially if it's a minimum wage job with terrible pay and conditions.
I don't see what inherent value "working" has, naturally if you can get the same outcome with less effort wouldn't you want to do so? I understand the need for a goal, passion, or something to pass time, yet can't that just be your own passion and not some shit job that really only benefits someone else?
I don't really see the value in "contributing to society" either. I mean yes, I understand that I am a part of society, and I have society to thank for not being killed and eaten, getting food, water, etc fairly easily, but at least for me, everything I get from society is transactional. Yes, I may get a house, food, water, electricity, transportation.. but this is only because I paid for it, which in itself money is just made up by society
maybe I'm just rambling, but I hope I'm conveying my point well
The BIGGEST loser trait people often cite is the idea of someone not working, living with their parents, etc etc.. and I really don't see how that's so bad? How is just typing numbers into a spreadsheet any more valuable?
Being honest, most careers are terrible, and the few that genuinely pay well require either countless years of school, going to an elite college, familial connections, etc, etc, and even then that's just not accounting for your own strengths and weaknesses.
People often shit on some rich trust fund kid living off of their parents money, claiming that they didn't earn it, but do we earn anything? A lot of models and actors get rich off of their looks alone, which they were just born with. Most people don't have the intelligence to become doctors or programmers. So on. Who cares if they didn't earn it? Is, say, Michael Jordan's achievements worth any less because if he were a few inches shorter (something entirely genetic) he probably wouldn't have been in the NBA? Not to mention his insane genetic traits, skills, etc. Of course he worked hard and had a good mindset, but you understand my point
And going back to the value of goals and merits, why does this have to be through such a system? I think I'd get much more fulfillment from being a NEET that had a genuine hobby he pursued all the time (say music or something) than working some shit office job. Most people don't really have any meaningful achievements either, so I don't really understand that.
I get that societal functioning is dependent upon this too, but one can acknowledge that yet still realize what's better for an individual or from an individualistic lens. Regardless, we can move past all of this entirely with things like AI and automation.
If you ask me personally, why I was ambitious, it's a very simple and blunt answer. It was really just due to my ego, I thought that I was better than everyone else so I deserved to be above them and the best of the best in life. To do whatever I wanted, have luxury, get worshipped by people, etc. I know full well how much of an asshole that makes me look, but I'm just being honest here. I think that sort of conveys my point to, the fact that I only saw it as worthy because of my own ego rather than any inherent value. But I don't know, I could be wrong.
Anyone have any differing opinions?