RimeOfTheAncient
Already Dead
- Oct 17, 2025
- 8
What I mean by that is having this belief that some people are just better off being gone. That maybe both they and the world would only benefit from them being gone. I mean, probably the most common example, one that even some pro-lifers might agree with, is the terminally ill person with less than six months left to live, who would be in great pain during those last days. For me, no matter how I think about it, as long as they have their mental faculties about them and it's their own choice, those people just might be better off being gone. Perhaps not all of them, but at least I don't think it should be considered, by modern Western standards (and others I haven't researched other cultures as much), to be evil, amoral, or even a strange position to take. And why stop there? What about the older person with no or few loved ones to take care of them? Why would they not be better off having the option to die peacefully? And where does someone draw that line who gets to have the right to choose to go? What about someone younger, but who has no real future or hope either physically (paraplegic, genetic disorder), mentally (treatment-resistant depression, schizophrenia), or socioeconomically (poor or uneducated), or all of the above? I don't understand why someone like that would be "better off" alive than not.I would love to hear other people's opinions on the topic, but my logic is that only a person can determine if they are best served living or not, and that it's really no one else's prerogative to judge that choice. What do you guys think, and why?