Y
yippie
New Member
- Jan 19, 2026
- 3
Hello everyone. This is my first post after following the forums for the past month.
In February, I will be CTB. As for my method, I'm stuck between SN and SA. I have an abundance of both thanks to my occupation, so procuring is not an issue.
Two concerns I have are:
1. Detectability post mortem
2. Survivability and facing a fate worse than death
For legal reasons, I need my death to be as little suicide-like as possible. I know SN have very clear signs after death. However where I live, suicide by SN is unheard of (or unlikely to be ruled as cause of death without in depth examination). I'm not entirely sure of the signs SA leaves after death, but question is:
Which one would raise suspicion more when examined, and potentially end up being ruled as "suicide" by the coroner?
And the other question is:
Which one is the definitive, most reliable method? I know SA has no antidote, and that they both cause some sort of oxygen deficiency. I'm afraid of surviving and ending up with brain damage and becoming a liability.
Thank you all
In February, I will be CTB. As for my method, I'm stuck between SN and SA. I have an abundance of both thanks to my occupation, so procuring is not an issue.
Two concerns I have are:
1. Detectability post mortem
2. Survivability and facing a fate worse than death
For legal reasons, I need my death to be as little suicide-like as possible. I know SN have very clear signs after death. However where I live, suicide by SN is unheard of (or unlikely to be ruled as cause of death without in depth examination). I'm not entirely sure of the signs SA leaves after death, but question is:
Which one would raise suspicion more when examined, and potentially end up being ruled as "suicide" by the coroner?
And the other question is:
Which one is the definitive, most reliable method? I know SA has no antidote, and that they both cause some sort of oxygen deficiency. I'm afraid of surviving and ending up with brain damage and becoming a liability.
Thank you all