Anhedonic
Member
- Mar 14, 2020
- 16
When I first started looking into this three years ago, amitriptyline plus diazepam plus antiemetics seemed like the most accessible and peaceful method, and the long duration wasn't a problem for me.
Three years on, as I find myself back in a similar place, I'm starting to feel like I was indulging in wishful thinking. The crux? Being sedated and being free of pain aren't the same thing. Sure, people who say they've failed at this method say they don't remember any pain, but that's not the same as not experiencing any. It seems entirely possible that a high dose of diazepam produces anterograde amnesia upon awakening, but that you still have conscious experiences while you're sedated.
This article says "They do not provide any analgesia" but then just after, "Benzodiazepines are primarily used for premedication and sedation and also for induction of general anesthesia in high doses."
Does it just mean they don't provide analgesia when you've taken a small dose and aren't "fully under"? Or perhaps it's possible they induce a state that would be considered a general anaesthetic but where you could still feel some kind of pain?
I'm sure minds do weird things when they're dying, and I'm just imagining being deeply sedated but finding myself trapped in some horrible dream world where I know I'm dying and I can feel all the pain of it in some abstract nightmarish way and it goes on for what feels like an eternity because my perception of time is severely distorted.
I know there's no definitive answer to this because no one has been there and come back with memory of what they experienced, but I'd appreciate if anyone could share their thoughts on this or point me to any resources that might shed some more light on it. I can certainly see the irony in the possibility that in trying to escape I might find myself locked in an eternal hellscape of my mind's own creation.
Three years on, as I find myself back in a similar place, I'm starting to feel like I was indulging in wishful thinking. The crux? Being sedated and being free of pain aren't the same thing. Sure, people who say they've failed at this method say they don't remember any pain, but that's not the same as not experiencing any. It seems entirely possible that a high dose of diazepam produces anterograde amnesia upon awakening, but that you still have conscious experiences while you're sedated.
This article says "They do not provide any analgesia" but then just after, "Benzodiazepines are primarily used for premedication and sedation and also for induction of general anesthesia in high doses."
Does it just mean they don't provide analgesia when you've taken a small dose and aren't "fully under"? Or perhaps it's possible they induce a state that would be considered a general anaesthetic but where you could still feel some kind of pain?
I'm sure minds do weird things when they're dying, and I'm just imagining being deeply sedated but finding myself trapped in some horrible dream world where I know I'm dying and I can feel all the pain of it in some abstract nightmarish way and it goes on for what feels like an eternity because my perception of time is severely distorted.
I know there's no definitive answer to this because no one has been there and come back with memory of what they experienced, but I'd appreciate if anyone could share their thoughts on this or point me to any resources that might shed some more light on it. I can certainly see the irony in the possibility that in trying to escape I might find myself locked in an eternal hellscape of my mind's own creation.