![TAW122](/data/avatars/l/2/2141.jpg?1557114434)
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,662
The motto and modus operandi of prolifers is that they "want others to live (against their will and at all costs), but not necessarily live well". Contrary to what some others say "they don't want me/others to live" or "they don't want me/others to thrive", the truth is that they (the pro-lifers) DO want their target person to live, by keeping said person alive against their will and perpetually in abject conditions (not fixing the cause of poor quality of life (or being unable to) while insisting (and even using force to) the sufferer to remain alive just so they can fulfill their atavistic, despicable worldview. It mostly has nothing to do with the sufferer finding peace or relief from suffering, but mainly everything benefiting the pro-lifer, even at the cost of the sufferer. By thriving it is usually limited to just having basic needs, but not fulfilling anything beyond that (quality of life, independence, bodily autonomy, and enjoyable things for others.)
Additionally, what is quite disgusting is the fact that they like to use people who are in terrible circumstances (severe disabilities and handicaps, severe illnesses, and other stuff) but are still alive just to inspire those to live while sidelining those who don't share their same view. They tout the fact that "they're alive!" as some evidence towards that life is worth living and that people enjoy living and adapting to whatever challenge life throws at them or something trite like that… Though for the people who don't really enjoy living, they are sidelined and silenced into oblivion, like not even talked about, forgotten. I would even go as far to argue that the amount of people in horrible predicaments with serious handicaps and illnesses are not accurately represented in their willingness to die, and the data is most likely cherrypicked. Like, when is the last time you ever hear about advertisements or examples of people who are in terrible predicaments and wanting to die in the media? The answer is almost never, because it simply doesn't fit the narrative of the pro-lifers! Nevertheless, I digress, but ultimately the point is they just want people to "live" as in exist and be alive, but don't care about suffering while being alive.
They feel like it's a victory if a person suffering is alive, regardless of the consequences incurred by the sufferer, just as long as the sufferer is not dead. This is just really wrong and despicable. In the end, like (the late) Danny Thomas from TRTNLE (and an ex-SaSu member from many years ago) said "They (pro-lifers) only care as long as you are breathing and your heart is beating." (paraphrased a bit, but the meaning is more/less the same). You could be on life support and struggling, but they (the pro-lifers) will just keep one alive regardless of predicament (maybe only with terminal illnesses, but even then it's unlikely and not guaranteed). Hence, it is no surprise, and of course, preaching to the SaSu choir; that pro-lifers are nothing more than narcissistic busybody gatekeepers of others, even among themselves.
Additionally, what is quite disgusting is the fact that they like to use people who are in terrible circumstances (severe disabilities and handicaps, severe illnesses, and other stuff) but are still alive just to inspire those to live while sidelining those who don't share their same view. They tout the fact that "they're alive!" as some evidence towards that life is worth living and that people enjoy living and adapting to whatever challenge life throws at them or something trite like that… Though for the people who don't really enjoy living, they are sidelined and silenced into oblivion, like not even talked about, forgotten. I would even go as far to argue that the amount of people in horrible predicaments with serious handicaps and illnesses are not accurately represented in their willingness to die, and the data is most likely cherrypicked. Like, when is the last time you ever hear about advertisements or examples of people who are in terrible predicaments and wanting to die in the media? The answer is almost never, because it simply doesn't fit the narrative of the pro-lifers! Nevertheless, I digress, but ultimately the point is they just want people to "live" as in exist and be alive, but don't care about suffering while being alive.
They feel like it's a victory if a person suffering is alive, regardless of the consequences incurred by the sufferer, just as long as the sufferer is not dead. This is just really wrong and despicable. In the end, like (the late) Danny Thomas from TRTNLE (and an ex-SaSu member from many years ago) said "They (pro-lifers) only care as long as you are breathing and your heart is beating." (paraphrased a bit, but the meaning is more/less the same). You could be on life support and struggling, but they (the pro-lifers) will just keep one alive regardless of predicament (maybe only with terminal illnesses, but even then it's unlikely and not guaranteed). Hence, it is no surprise, and of course, preaching to the SaSu choir; that pro-lifers are nothing more than narcissistic busybody gatekeepers of others, even among themselves.